A Markov Chain-Based Group Consensus Method with Unknown Parameters

被引:1
作者
Fu, Chao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chang, Wenjun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Box 270, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Proc Optimizat & Intelligent Decis Making, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Educ, Engn Res Ctr Intelligent Decis Making & Informat S, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group consensus; Unknown parameters; Multi-criteria group decision-making; Markov chain; Convergency of group consensus; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; MODEL; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s10726-024-09876-y
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Group consensus (GC) is important for generating a group solution satisfactory or acceptable to most decision-makers in a group. Its convergency usually depends on several rounds of iterations and becomes more difficult with unknown parameters because GC is usually associated with parameters. To address the GC with unknown parameters, this paper proposes a Markov chain-based GC method, in which criterion weights and expert weights are considered as parameters. Given the interval-valued assessments of decision-makers, the GC at the alternative and global levels is defined. Based on the Markov chain, a two-hierarchical randomization algorithm is designed with unknown criterion weights to determine the transition probability matrix used to generate the stable GC. To accelerate the stable GC's convergency, criteria significantly contributing negatives to the stable GC are identified and suggestions on helping renew decision-makers' assessments on the identified criteria are provided. On the condition that the stable GC is definitely satisfied, a GC-based two-hierarchical randomization algorithm is designed based on the Markov chain to determine the transition probability matrix for generating the stable ranking value distribution of each alternative. The proposed method is employed to analyze a development mode selection problem. It is compared with the stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis and simple additive weighting methods based on the problem by calculation and principle.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1048
页数:30
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   A group evidential reasoning approach based on expert reliability [J].
Fu, Chao ;
Yang, Jian-Bo ;
Yang, Shan-Lin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 246 (03) :886-893
[12]   An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements [J].
Fu, Chao ;
Yang, Shanlin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (01) :167-176
[13]   An attribute weight based feedback model for multiple attributive group decision analysis problems with group consensus requirements in evidential reasoning context [J].
Fu, Chao ;
Yang, Shanlin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 212 (01) :179-189
[14]  
Gallager RG., 1997, J OPER RES SOC, V48, P103, DOI [10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600329, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.JORS.2600329]
[15]   Dynamic clustering of interval data using a Wasserstein-based distance [J].
Irpino, Antonio ;
Verde, Rosanna .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2008, 29 (11) :1648-1658
[16]   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PARTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT ATTRIBUTE WEIGHTS FOR RANKING ALTERNATIVES IN MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING [J].
KIRKWOOD, CW ;
CORNER, JL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1993, 54 (03) :456-476
[17]   SMAA-2: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making [J].
Lahdelma, R ;
Salminen, P .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2001, 49 (03) :444-454
[18]  
Leon-Garcia A., 1994, PROBABILITY RANDOM P, V2nd ed.
[19]   STABILITY ANALYSES OF GROUP DECISION-MAKING [J].
MADU, CN ;
KUEI, CH .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1995, 28 (04) :881-892
[20]   Are distrust relationships beneficial for group performance? The influence of the scope of distrust on the emergence of collective intelligence [J].
Massari, Giovanni F. ;
Giannoccaro, Ilaria ;
Carbone, Giuseppe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 208 :343-355