Convenient tools and social norms: Measuring the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce household food waste

被引:10
作者
van Herpen, Erica [1 ]
Wijnen, Tess [1 ]
Quested, Tom [2 ]
Reynolds, Christian [3 ]
Sharda, Nikita [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] WRAP Waste & Resources Act Programme, Second Floor,Blenheim Court,19 George St, Banbury OX16 5BH, Oxon, England
[3] City Univ London, Ctr Food Policy, Myddelton St Bldg,Myddelton St, London EC1R 1UW, England
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Intervention; Food waste; Self-report; Motivation; Waste-preventing behaviours; BEHAVIOR; CONSUMERS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139604
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Halving food loss and waste is the target of the UN's Sustainability Development Goal 12.3, and household food waste constitutes a substantial part of global food waste. Effective interventions that decrease household food waste are urgently needed, and these could target various underlying behaviours such as planning, storing, preparing and consuming. There is a lack of studies that develop interventions based on theory and that compare different intervention options. Moreover, in testing the effectiveness of such interventions, possible influences caused by the measurement method need to be assessed. The current study explores two interventions, based on the Motivation-Opportunity-Ability framework, to test if combining a tool package (containing various waste reducing tools such as a measuring cup, stickers, leaflets, recipes) with a motivational message based on social norms is more effective than the tool package alone. Additionally, it examines the effects of using a self reported survey measurement for household food waste, to ensure that results are not caused by increased consumer awareness of food waste due to measurement alone. Findings show that the tool package significantly improves waste-preventing behaviours, and decreases self-reported food waste by 39.2% (experiment 1) and 23.0% (experiment 2). Effects on waste-preventing behaviours are stronger when social norm elements are added in the intervention. Results of the second experiment indicate that effects of self-reported measurement are minimal, which provides initial support for the use of self-reported food waste measurement in intervention testing albeit that underreporting remains an issue and more research is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, A National Strategy to Reduce Food Waste at the Consumer Level, A National Strategy to Reduce Food Waste at the Consumer Level, DOI DOI 10.17226/25876
  • [2] What Nudge Techniques Work for Food Waste Behaviour Change at the Consumer Level? A Systematic Review
    Barker, Hannah
    Shaw, Peter J.
    Richards, Beth
    Clegg, Zoe
    Smith, Dianna
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [3] When less is more: Consumer aversion to unused utility
    Bolton, Lisa E.
    Alba, Joseph W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 22 (03) : 369 - 383
  • [4] Use-up day and flexible recipes: Reducing household food waste by helping families prepare food they already have
    Cooper, A.
    Lion, R.
    Rodriguez-Sierra, O. E.
    Jeffrey, P.
    Thomson, D.
    Peters, K.
    Christopher, L.
    Zhu, M. J. H.
    Wistrand, L.
    van der Werf, P.
    van Herpen, E.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 194
  • [5] Stangherlin ID, 2020, J INT FOOD AGRIBUS M, V32, P30
  • [6] Exploring the Drivers behind Self-Reported and Measured Food Wastage
    Elimelech, Efrat
    Ert, Eyal
    Ayalon, Ofira
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [7] Forbes H., 2021, UNEP FOOD WASTE INDE
  • [8] Hayes A.F., 2018, INTRO MEDIATION MODE, Vsecond
  • [9] Household food waste: Drivers and potential intervention points for design - An extensive review
    Hebrok, Marie
    Boks, Casper
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 151 : 380 - 392
  • [10] Outcome Evaluation of an Empirical Study: Food Waste Social Marketing Pilot
    Kim, Jeawon
    Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn
    Knox, Kathy
    Hodgkins, Samuel
    [J]. SOCIAL MARKETING QUARTERLY, 2020, 26 (02) : 111 - 128