Efficacy of Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:43
作者
Goodoory, Vivek C. [1 ,2 ]
Khasawneh, Mais [1 ,2 ]
Black, Christopher J. [1 ,2 ]
Quigley, Eamonn M. M. [3 ]
Moayyedi, Paul [4 ]
Ford, Alexander C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St James Univ Hosp, Leeds Gastroenterol Inst, Room 125,4th Floor,Bexley Wing,Beckett St, Leeds LS9 7TF, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Biomed & Clin Sci, Leeds, England
[3] Houston Methodist Hosp, Lynda K & David M Underwood Ctr Digest Disorders, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Houston, TX USA
[4] McMaster Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Gastroenterol Div, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Meta-analysis; Probiotics; Abdominal Pain; Abdominal Bloating; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT; FECAL MICROBIOTA; PREBIOTICS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2023.07.018
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Some probiotics may be beneficial in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but differences in species and strains used, as well as endpoints reported, have hampered attempts to make specific recommendations as to which should be preferred. We updated our previous meta-analysis exam-ining this issue. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (up to March 2023). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults with IBS, comparing probiotics with placebo were eligible. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain a relative risk of global symptoms, abdominal pain, or abdominal bloating or distension persisting after therapy, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous data were pooled using a standardized mean difference with a 95% CI. Adverse events data were also pooled. RESULTS: We identified 82 eligible trials, containing 10,332 patients. Only 24 RCTs were at low risk of bias across all domains. For global symptoms, there was moderate certainty in the evidence for a benefit of Escherichia strains, low certainty for Lactobacillus strains and Lactobacillus plantarum 299V, and very low certainty for combination pro-biotics, LacClean Gold S, Duolac 7s, and Bacillus strains. For abdominal pain, there was low certainty in the evidence for a benefit of Saccharomyces cerevisae I-3856 and Bifidobacterium strains, and very low certainty for combination probiotics, Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces, and Bacillus strains. For abdom-inal bloating or distension there was very low certainty in the evidence for a benefit of combination probiotics and Bacillus strains. The relative risk of experiencing any adverse event, in 55 trials, including more than 7000 patients, was not signifi- cantly higher with probiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Some combina-tions of probiotics or strains may be beneficial in IBS. However, certainty in the evidence for efficacy by GRADE criteria was low to very low across almost all of our analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:1206 / 1218
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders 2 Irritable bowel syndrome [J].
Ford, Alexander C. ;
Sperber, Ami D. ;
Corsetti, Maura ;
Camilleri, Michael .
LANCET, 2020, 396 (10263) :1675-1688
[12]   Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in irritable bowel syndrome [J].
Ford, Alexander C. ;
Harris, Lucinda A. ;
Lacy, Brian E. ;
Quigley, Eamonn M. M. ;
Moayyedi, Paul .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 48 (10) :1044-1060
[13]   Efficacy of Prebiotics, Probiotics, and Synbiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Chronic Idiopathic Constipation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Ford, Alexander C. ;
Quigley, Eamonn M. M. ;
Lacy, Brian E. ;
Lembo, Anthony J. ;
Saito, Yuri A. ;
Schiller, Lawrence R. ;
Soffer, Edy E. ;
Spiegel, Brennan M. R. ;
Moayyedi, Paul .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (10) :1547-1561
[14]   Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Ford, Alexander C. ;
Spiegel, Brennan M. R. ;
Talley, Nicholas J. ;
Moayyedi, Paul .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 7 (12) :1279-1286
[15]   Imputing response rates from means and standard deviations in meta-analyses [J].
Furukawa, TA ;
Cipriani, A ;
Barbui, C ;
Brambilla, P ;
Watanabe, N .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 20 (01) :49-52
[16]   Factors associated with lower disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life in Rome IV irritable bowel syndrome [J].
Goodoory, Vivek C. ;
Guthrie, Elspeth A. ;
Ng, Cho E. ;
Black, Christopher J. ;
Ford, Alexander C. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 57 (03) :323-334
[17]   Impact of Rome IV Irritable Bowel Syndrome on Work and Activities of Daily Living [J].
Goodoory, Vivek C. ;
Ng, Cho Ee ;
Black, Christopher J. ;
Ford, Alexander C. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 56 (05) :844-856
[18]   Direct healthcare costs of Rome IV or Rome III-defined irritable bowel syndrome in the United Kingdom [J].
Goodoory, Vivek C. ;
Ng, Cho Ee ;
Black, Christopher J. ;
Ford, Alexander C. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 56 (01) :110-120
[19]   Willingness to accept risk with medication in return for cure of symptoms among patients with Rome IV irritable bowel syndrome [J].
Goodoory, Vivek C. ;
Ng, Cho Ee ;
Black, Christopher J. ;
Ford, Alexander C. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 55 (10) :1311-1319
[20]  
Higgins J., 2021, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3