Determinants of the willingness to pay and willingness to accept in the valuation of informal care. The CUIDARSE study

被引:1
|
作者
Oliva, Juan [1 ]
Longobardo, Luz Maria Pena [1 ]
Garcia-Mochon, Leticia [2 ,3 ]
Abellan-Perpinan, Jose Maria [4 ]
Garcia-Calvente, Maria del Mar [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Econ Anal & Finance, Toledo, Spain
[2] Escuela Andaluza Salud Publ, Granada, Spain
[3] CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Granada, Spain
[4] Univ Murcia, Dept Econ Aplicada, Murcia, Spain
[5] Inst Invest Biosanitaria Granada, Granada, Spain
来源
APPLIED ECONOMIC ANALYSIS | 2023年 / 31卷 / 93期
关键词
Contingent valuation; Informal care; WTA; WTP; Spain; WTA-WTP DISPARITY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; PROSPECT-THEORY; COST; EUROPE; DECISION; ILLNESS; ADO;
D O I
10.1108/AEA-02-2023-0044
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThis paper aims to study the value of informal care (IC) time from the perspective of caregivers using two alternative contingent valuation tools - willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) - and to identify the variables that affect the stated values.Design/methodology/approachThe authors used data from a multi-centre study of 610 adult caregivers conducted in two Spanish regions in 2013. The existence of "protest zeros" and "economic zeros" because of the severe budgetary constraints of the households was also considered. Two-part multivariate models were used to analyse the main factors that explained the declared values of WTA and WTP.FindingsThe average WTP and WTA were euro3.12 and euro5.98 per hour of care, respectively (euro3.2 and euro6.3 when estimated values for "protest zeros" and "economic zeros" were considered). Some explanatory variables of WTA and WTP are coincident (place of residence and intensity of care time), whereas other variables only help to explain WTP values (household and negative coping with caregiving) or WTA values (age and burden of care). Some nuances are also identified when comparing the results obtained without protest and economic zeros with the estimated values of these special zeros.Originality/valueStudies analysing the determinants of WTP and WTA in IC settings are very scarce. This paper seeks to provide information to fill this gap. The results indicate that the variables that explain the value of IC from one perspective may differ from the variables that explain it from an alternative perspective. Given the relevance of contextual factors, studies on the topic should be expanded, and care should be taken with the extrapolation of results across countries and settings.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 222
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies
    Caroline Steigenberger
    Magdalena Flatscher-Thoeni
    Uwe Siebert
    Andrea M. Leiter
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2022, 23 : 1455 - 1482
  • [22] Reference-dependent valuations of risk: Why willingness-to-accept exceeds willingness-to-pay
    Viscusi, W. Kip
    Huber, Joel
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2012, 44 (01) : 19 - 44
  • [23] Greenways, recreational access and landowner willingness to accept: a contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland
    McGurk, Eoin
    Hynes, Stephen
    Manton, Richard
    Thorne, Fiona
    Clifford, Eoghan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 62 (13) : 2375 - 2392
  • [24] Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies
    Steigenberger, Caroline
    Flatscher-Thoeni, Magdalena
    Siebert, Uwe
    Leiter, Andrea M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2022, 23 (09): : 1455 - 1482
  • [25] Economic Valuation of the University of Brasília Arboretum and Determinants of Willingness to Pay for the Arboretum
    Alvares, Manuella de Rezende
    Angelo, Humberto
    de Almeida, Alexandre Nascimento
    de Paula, Maristela Franchetti
    Brasil, Alexandre Anders
    Matricardi, Eraldo Aparecido Trondoli
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [26] Store brand vs. national brand prices: Willingness to pay ≠ willingness to accept
    Boyle, Peter J.
    Lathrop, E. Scott
    Kim, Hyoshin
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL SCHOLARS OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2021, 31 (04) : 563 - 579
  • [27] The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap revisited: The role of emotions and moral satisfaction
    Biel, Anders
    Johansson-Stenman, Olof
    Nilsson, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 32 (06) : 908 - 917
  • [28] Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: A contingent valuation study
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    Kwak, So-Yoon
    ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) : 5408 - 5416
  • [29] A Differential Motivation Account for the Disparity between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay
    Kim, Tom Joonhwan
    Srivastava, Joydeep
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 263 - 282
  • [30] Investigating Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Asymmetry in Choice Experiments
    Lanz, Bruno
    Provins, Allan
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Scarpa, Riccardo
    Willis, Ken
    Ozdemiroglu, Ece
    CHOICE MODELLING: THE STATE-OF-THE-ART AND THE STATE-OF-PRACTICE, 2010, : 517 - 541