Treatment strategies for endoleak after endovascular repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm: A single center retrospective study

被引:1
作者
Li, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Pengcheng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Lunchang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Quanming [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Qiu, Jian [1 ,2 ]
He, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jiehua [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Chenzi [1 ,2 ]
Shu, Chang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Vasc Surg, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Inst Vasc Dis, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm; repair; Endoleak; Endovascular treatment; Surgical repair; TYPE-2; ENDOLEAK; ENDOTENSION; MANAGEMENT; EXPANSION; OUTCOMES; CHIMNEY; GRAFT; EVAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.01.052
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the most frequently used treat-ment for aneurysm in abdominal aorta. The endoleak after EVAR causes the aneurysm sac to remain enlarged and risk for rupture. Aims: The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of strategies and techniques for endoleak treatment. Methods: This study was a single center retrospective study of 30 patients who had kinds of endoleak. The 30 patients were from a cohort of 597 patients who received EVAR from the Secondary Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between Jan 2014 to Dec 2021, what is follow-up well and diagnosed as endoleak. Data included basic clinical information, aspects of the endoleak treatment techniques, and follow-up findings. Results: The 30 patients with endoleak were diagnosed by computed tomography angiography or digital subtraction angiography. Age is 69 & PLUSMN; 7.9 yrs. 26 patients are male with only 4 female patients. Immediate endoleak after EVAR is 46.7%and delayed endoleak is 53.3%. The classification of endoleak is type I:76.6%; type II 26.7%; type III:6.7%; type IV:6.7%; type V:13.3%. Different treatment of endoleak includes: screening, endovascular re-intervention and open surgery. There are 3 patients (10.0%) underwent emergency EVAR due to their rupture condition of aneurysm. All the endoleak patients' CTA image characteristics has been reviewed. The follow-up rate is 93.3%. There are 6 patients (21.4%) died during follow-up. No aneurysm sac rupture death has been recorded. Conclusions: Endoleak after EVAR is the most frequent complication that directly affects survival and re-intervention rates. Our findings suggested that different treatment strategies based on the individual patient's situation is important for their endoleak treating result. & COPY; 2023 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:3748 / 3754
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] 1992: Parodi, Montefiore, and the first abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft in the United States
    Veith, FJ
    Marin, ML
    Cynamon, J
    Schonholz, C
    Parodi, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 19 (05) : 749 - 751
  • [32] VOLODOS NL, 1986, VESTN KHIR IM GREKOV, V137, P123
  • [33] Application of a Novel Common-Iliac-Artery Skirt Technology (CST) in Treating Challenge Aorto-Iliac or Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms
    Wang, Lunchang
    Shu, Chang
    Li, Quanming
    Li, Ming
    He, Hao
    Li, Xin
    Shi, Yin
    Qiu, Jian
    Wang, Tun
    Yang, Chenzi
    Wang, Mo
    Li, Jiehua
    Wang, Hui
    Sun, Likun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [34] Predisposing Factors for Migration of the Iliac Limb and Reintervention after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Wang, Yuewei
    Li, Changfeng
    Xin, Hai
    Li, Jun
    Wang, Haofu
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 59 : 91 - 101
  • [35] Systematic review of chimney and periscope grafts for endovascular aneurysm repair
    Wilson, A.
    Zhou, S.
    Bachoo, P.
    Tambyraja, A. L.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (12) : 1557 - 1564