Nomogram for prognosis of elderly patients with cervical cancer who receive combined radiotherapy

被引:7
作者
Chen, Wenjuan [1 ]
Xia, Xiaoyi [1 ]
Xie, Xingyun [1 ]
Wei, Yuting [1 ]
Wu, Rongrong [1 ]
Cai, Wenjie [2 ]
Hong, Jinsheng [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Canc Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dept Gynecol,Clin Oncol Sch, Fuzhou 350014, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Hosp Quanzhou 1, Dept Radiat Oncol, Quanzhou 362000, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, Fuzhou 350005, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Key Lab Radiat Biol Fujian Higher Educ Inst, Fuzhou 350005, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, Binhai Campus, Fuzhou 350212, Peoples R China
关键词
STAGE; WOMEN; PATTERNS; CARE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-39764-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This retrospective study identified prognostic factors to help guide the clinical treatment of elderly patients (& GE; 65 years) with cervical cancer who had undergone radiotherapy. A personalized model to predict 3- and 5-years survival was developed. A review was conducted of 367 elderly women with cervical cancer (staged II-III) who had undergone radiotherapy in our hospital between January 2012 and December 2016. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for survival analysis that considered age, hemoglobin, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, pathologic type, stage, pelvic lymph node metastasis status, and others. A nomogram was constructed to predict the survival rates. The median follow-up time was 71 months (4-118 months). The 3- (5-) years overall, progression-free, local recurrence-free, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were, respectively, 91.0% (84.4%), 92.3% (85.9%), 99.18% (99.01%), and 99.18% (97.82%). The following were significant independent prognostic factors for overall survival: tumor size, pre-treatment hemoglobin, chemotherapy, and pelvic lymph node metastasis. The C-index of the line chart was 0.699 (95% CI 0.652-0.746). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for 3- and 5-years survival were 0.751 and 0.724. The nomogram was in good concordance with the actual survival rates. The independent prognostic factors for overall survival in elderly patients with cervical cancer after radiotherapy were: tumor size, pre-treatment hemoglobin, chemotherapy, and pelvic lymph node metastasis. The novel prognostic nomogram based on these factors showed good concordance with the actual survival rates and can be used to guide personalized clinical treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GLOB CANC FACT SHEET
[2]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[3]   Image guided adaptive external beam radiation therapy for cervix cancer: Evaluation of a clinically implemented plan-of-the-day technique [J].
Buschmann, Martin ;
Majercakova, Katarina ;
Sturdza, Alina ;
Smet, Stephanie ;
Najjari, Dina ;
Daniel, Michaela ;
Poetter, Richard ;
Georg, Dietmar ;
Seppenwoolde, Yvette .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2018, 28 (03) :184-195
[4]   Topographic distribution of lymph node metastasis in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer: an analysis of 8314 lymph nodes [J].
Cai, Jing ;
He, Xiaoqi ;
Wang, Hongbo ;
Dong, Weihong ;
Zhang, Yuan ;
Zhao, Jing ;
Willborn, Kay C. ;
Huang, Bangxing ;
Wang, Zehua ;
Jiang, Ping .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
[5]   Prognostic value of tumor measurement parameters and SCC-Ag changes in patients with locally-advanced cervical cancer [J].
Chen, Wenjuan ;
Xiu, Siyi ;
Xie, Xingyun ;
Guo, Huiming ;
Xu, Yuanji ;
Bai, Penggang ;
Xia, Xiaoyi .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
[6]   Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervix cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Datta, Niloy Ranjan ;
Stutz, Emanuel ;
Liu, Michael ;
Rogers, Susanne ;
Klingbiel, Dirk ;
Siebenhuner, Alexander ;
Singh, Shalini ;
Bodis, Stephan .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 (02) :374-385
[7]   Assessment of treatment factors and clinical outcomes in cervical cancer in older women compared to women under 65 years old [J].
Diver, Elisabeth J. ;
Hinchcliff, Emily M. ;
Gockley, Allison A. ;
Melamed, Alexander ;
Contrino, Leah ;
Feldman, Sarah ;
Growdon, Whitfield B. .
JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (05) :516-519
[8]   Cervical Cancer Incidence Among Elderly Women in Massachusetts Compared With Younger Women [J].
Feldman, Sarah ;
Cook, Erin ;
Davis, Michelle ;
Gershman, Susan T. ;
Hanchate, Amresh ;
Haas, Jennifer S. ;
Perkins, Rebecca B. .
JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2018, 22 (04) :314-317
[9]   The evaluation of older patients with cervical cancer [J].
Gao, Ying ;
Ma, Jin-lu ;
Gao, Fei ;
Song, Li-ping .
CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2013, 8 :783-788
[10]   Safety and Tolerance of Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Elderly [J].
George, Erin M. ;
Tergas, Ana I. ;
Ananth, Cande V. ;
Burke, William M. ;
Lewin, Sharyn N. ;
Prendergast, Eri ;
Neugut, Alfred I. ;
Hershman, Dawn L. ;
Wright, Jason D. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 134 (01) :36-41