Non-disclosure of developmental neurotoxicity studies obstructs the safety assessment of pesticides in the European Union

被引:9
|
作者
Mie, Axel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ruden, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Environm Sci, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Soder Sjukhuset, Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, S-11883 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Ctr Organ Food & Farming EPOK, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Developmental neurotoxicity; Non-disclosure; Pesticides; Plant protection products; Regulatory assessment; Reporting bias; QUANTITATIVE COMPARABILITY; GUIDELINE; WORKSHOP; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1186/s12940-023-00994-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn the European Union (EU), the safety assessment of plant protection products relies to a large extent on toxicity studies commissioned by the companies producing them. By law, all performed studies must be included in the dossier submitted to authorities when applying for approval or renewal of the active substance.MethodsFor one type of toxicity, i.e. developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), we evaluated if studies submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had also been disclosed to EU authorities.ResultsWe identified 35 DNT studies submitted to the U.S. EPA and with the corresponding EU dossiers available. Of these, 9 DNT studies (26%) were not disclosed by the pesticide company to EU authorities. For 7 of these studies, we have identified an actual or potential regulatory impact.ConclusionsWe conclude that (1) non-disclosure of DNT studies to EU authorities, in spite of clear legal requirements, seems to be a recurring phenomenon, (2) the non-disclosure may introduce a bias in the regulatory risk assessment, and (3) without full access to all performed toxicity studies, there can be no reliable safety evaluation of pesticides by EU authorities. We suggest that EU authorities should cross-check their data sets with their counterparts in other jurisdictions. In addition, applications for pesticide approval should be cross-checked against lists of studies performed at test facilities operating under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), to ensure that all studies have been submitted to authorities. Furthermore, rules should be amended so that future studies should be commissioned by authorities rather than companies. This ensures the authorities' knowledge of existing studies and prevents the economic interest of the company from influencing the design, performance, reporting and dissemination of studies. The rules or practices should also be revised to ensure that non-disclosure of toxicity studies carries a significant legal risk for pesticide companies.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] POST-MARKETING SAFETY STUDIES OF RECOMBINANT PORCINE FACTOR VIII IN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPEAN UNION
    Crea, Roberto
    Mauric, Oliver
    Huang, Jui-Fu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2018, 93 (09) : E13 - E13
  • [43] The effects of European Union supports on the non-profit organizations Based on studies of the EQUAL program
    Sebok Dora Valeria
    CIVIL SZEMLE, 2010, 7 (03): : 61 - +
  • [44] Letter to the editor regarding "safety of safety evaluation of pesticides: developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl" by Mie et al. (environmental health. 2018. 17:77)
    Juberg, Daland R.
    Hoberman, Alan M.
    Marty, Sue
    Picut, Catherine A.
    Stump, Donald G.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 18 (1)
  • [45] Letter to the editor regarding “safety of safety evaluation of pesticides: developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl” by Mie et al. (environmental health. 2018. 17:77)
    Daland R. Juberg
    Alan M. Hoberman
    Sue Marty
    Catherine A. Picut
    Donald G. Stump
    Environmental Health, 18
  • [46] Risk assessment of pesticides and other stressors in bees: Principles, data gaps and perspectives from the European Food Safety Authority
    Rortais, Agnes
    Arnold, Gerard
    Dorne, Jean-Lou
    More, Simon J.
    Sperandio, Giorgio
    Streissl, Franz
    Szentes, Csaba
    Verdonck, Frank
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 587 : 524 - 537
  • [47] Difference in Insulin Resistance Assessment between European Union and Non-European Union Obesity Treatment Centers (ESPE Obesity Working Group Insulin Resistance Project)
    Chaychenko, Tetyana
    Argente, Jesus
    Spiliotis, Bessie E.
    Wabitsch, Martin
    Marcus, Claude
    HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS, 2021, 93 (11-12): : 622 - 633
  • [48] Genotoxicity Testing Approaches for the Safety Assessment of Substances Used in Food Contact Materials Prior to Their Authorization in the European Union
    Bolognesi, Claudia
    Castoldi, Anna F.
    Crebelli, Riccardo
    Barthelemy, Eric
    Maurici, Daniela
    Woelfle, Detlef
    Volk, Katharina
    Castle, Laurence
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2017, 58 (05) : 361 - 374
  • [49] Developmental neurotoxicology in juvenile animal studies: Implications for infant safety assessment for food contact materials
    Nartey, Queenster
    Aungst, Jason
    Basso, Federica
    Elayan, Ikram
    Liu, Jie
    Ravindran, Arippa
    Wu, Yen-Ching
    Neal-Kluever, April
    NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 2018, 67 : 91 - 91
  • [50] Reporting Quality of Evaluations of Additional Risk Minimisation Measures by MAH: An Assessment of Studies Submitted in the European Union
    Okai, J.
    Bahri, P.
    Sarinic, V. Macolic
    DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 44 (12) : 1402 - 1403