Implementation and Outcome of Robotic Liver Surgery in the Netherlands A Nationwide Analysis

被引:21
作者
Gorgec, Burak [1 ,2 ]
Zwart, Maurice [1 ,2 ]
Nota, Carolijn L. [3 ]
Bijlstra, Okker D. [4 ]
Bosscha, Koop [5 ]
de Boer, Marieke T. [6 ]
de Wilde, Roeland F. [7 ]
Draaisma, Werner A. [5 ]
Gerhards, Michael F. [8 ]
Liem, Mike S. [9 ]
Lips, Daan J. [9 ]
Marsman, Hendrik A. [8 ]
Mieog, J. Sven D. [4 ]
Molenaar, Quintus, I [3 ]
Nijkamp, Maarten [6 ]
Te Riele, Wouter W. [10 ]
Terkivatan, Turkan [7 ]
Vahrmeijer, Alexander L. [4 ]
Besselink, Marc G. [1 ,2 ]
Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan [1 ,2 ,11 ]
Hagendoorn, Jeroen [3 ]
机构
[1] Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Surg, Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[7] Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[8] OLVG, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Med Spectrum Twente, Dept Surg, Enschede, Netherlands
[10] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Surg, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[11] Locat Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
hepatic resection; implementation; liver resection; liver surgery; minimally invasive liver resection; minimally invasive liver surgery; nationwide analysis; robotic liver resection; robotic liver surgery; MAJOR HEPATECTOMY; RESECTION; METASTASES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000005600
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To determine the nationwide implementation and surgical outcome of minor and major robotic liver surgery (RLS) and assess the first phase of implementation of RLS during the learning curve. Background:RLS may be a valuable alternative to laparoscopic liver surgery. Nationwide population-based studies with data on implementation and outcome of RLS are lacking. Methods:Multicenter retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients who underwent RLS for all indications in 9 Dutch centers (August 2014-March 2021). Data on all liver resections were obtained from the mandatory nationwide Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit (DHBA) including data from all 27 centers for liver surgery in the Netherlands. Outcomes were stratified for minor, technically major, and anatomically major RLS. Learning curve effect was assessed using cumulative sum analysis for blood loss. Results:Of 9437 liver resections, 400 were RLS (4.2%) procedures including 207 minor (52.2%), 141 technically major (35.3%), and 52 anatomically major (13%). The nationwide use of RLS increased from 0.2% in 2014 to 11.9% in 2020. The proportion of RLS among all minimally invasive liver resections increased from 2% to 28%. Median blood loss was 150 mL (interquartile range 50-350 mL] and the conversion rate 6.3% (n=25). The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade >= III complications was 7.0% (n=27), median length of hospital stay 4 days (interquartile range 2-5) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality 0.8% (n=3). The R0 resection rate was 83.2% (n=263). Cumulative sum analysis for blood loss found a learning curve of at least 33 major RLS procedures. Conclusions:The nationwide use of RLS in the Netherlands has increased rapidly with currently one-tenth of all liver resections and one-fourth of all minimally invasive liver resections being performed robotically. Although surgical outcomes of RLS in selected patient seem favorable, future prospective studies should determine its added value.
引用
收藏
页码:E1269 / E1277
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery From Indication to Implementation
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Dagher, Ibrahim
    Edwin, Bjorn
    Troisi, Roberto Ivan
    Alikhanov, Ruslan
    Aroori, Somaiah
    Belli, Giulio
    Besselink, Marc
    Briceno, Javier
    Gayet, Brice
    D'Hondt, Mathieu
    Lesurtel, Mickael
    Menon, Krishna
    Lodge, Peter
    Rotellar, Fernando
    Santoyo, Julio
    Scatton, Olivier
    Soubrane, Olivier
    Sutcliffe, Robert
    Van Dam, Ronald
    White, Steve
    Halls, Mark Christopher
    Cipriani, Federica
    Van der Poel, Marcel
    Ciria, Ruben
    Barkhatov, Leonid
    Gomez-Luque, Yrene
    Ocana-Garcia, Sira
    Cook, Andrew
    Buell, Joseph
    Clavien, Pierre-Alain
    Dervenis, Christos
    Fusai, Giuseppe
    Geller, David
    Lang, Hauke
    Primrose, John
    Taylor, Mark
    Van Gulik, Thomas
    Wakabayashi, Go
    Asbun, Horacio
    Cherqui, Daniel
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [2] Single-Centre Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hepatectomy
    Abu Hilal, Mohammed
    Di Fabio, Francesco
    Teng, Mabel Joey
    Lykoudis, Pavlos
    Primrose, John Neil
    Pearce, Neil William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2011, 15 (05) : 818 - 823
  • [3] Comprehensive analysis of laparoscopic, robotic, and open hepatectomy outcomes using the nationwide readmissions database
    Aziz, Hassan
    Wang, Johnny C.
    Genyk, Yuri
    Sheikh, Mohd Raashid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (02) : 401 - 407
  • [4] Long-Term and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Beard, Rachel E.
    Khan, Sidrah
    Troisi, Roberto I.
    Montalti, Roberto
    Vanlander, Aude
    Fong, Yuman
    Kingham, T. Peter
    Boerner, Thomas
    Berber, Eren
    Kahramangil, Bora
    Buell, Joseph F.
    Martinie, John B.
    Vrochides, Dionisios
    Shen, Chengli
    Molinari, Michele
    Geller, David A.
    Tsung, Allan
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (03) : 887 - 895
  • [5] Robotic Versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Matched Comparison
    Chen, Po-Da
    Wu, Chao-Ying
    Hu, Rey-Heng
    Chou, Wei-Han
    Lai, Hong-Shiee
    Liang, Jin-Tung
    Lee, Po-Huang
    Wu, Yao-Ming
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 1021 - 1028
  • [6] Robotic major hepatectomy: Is there a learning curve?
    Chen, Po-Da
    Wu, Chao-Yin
    Hu, Rey-Heng
    Chen, Chiung-Nien
    Yuan, Ray-Hwang
    Liang, Jin-Tung
    Lai, Hong-Shiee
    Wu, Yao-Ming
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) : 642 - 649
  • [7] Learning curves in minimally invasive hepatectomy: systematic review and meta-regression analysis
    Chua, Darren
    Syn, Nicholas
    Koh, Ye-Xin
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (04) : 351 - 358
  • [8] Pure laparoscopic versus robotic liver resections: Multicentric propensity score-based analysis with stratification according to difficulty scores
    Cipriani, Federica
    Fiorentini, Guido
    Magistri, Paolo
    Fontani, Andrea
    Menonna, Francesca
    Annecchiarico, Mario
    Lauterio, Andrea
    De Carlis, Luciano
    Coratti, Andrea
    Boggi, Ugo
    Ceccarelli, Graziano
    Di Benedetto, Fabrizio
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (10) : 1108 - 1123
  • [9] Laparoscopic Versus Open Major Hepatectomy: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness in a High-Volume Center
    Cipriani, Federica
    Ratti, Francesca
    Cardella, Arianna
    Catena, Marco
    Paganelli, Michele
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2019, 23 (11) : 2163 - 2173
  • [10] The impact of robotics in liver surgery: A worldwide systematic review and short-term outcomes meta-analysis on 2,728 cases
    Ciria, Ruben
    Berardi, Giammauro
    Alconchel, Felipe
    Briceno, Javier
    Choi, Gi Hong
    Wu, Yao-Ming
    Sugioka, Atsushi
    Troisi, Roberto Ivan
    Salloum, Chady
    Soubrane, Olivier
    Pratschke, Johann
    Martinie, John
    Tsung, Allan
    Araujo, Raphael
    Sucandy, Iswanto
    Tang, Chung N.
    Wakabayashi, Go
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (02) : 181 - 197