Does Digital Technology Promote Green Innovation Performance?

被引:33
作者
Zhao, Xing [1 ]
Qian, Yuanyuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[2] East China Normal Univ, Fac Econ & Management, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
关键词
Digital technology; Green innovation performance; Technology upgrading; Cost reduction; Green resource allocation optimization; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; PRODUCT INNOVATION; IMPACT; CAPABILITIES; CONSTRAINTS; TRADE; LABOR; ICT;
D O I
10.1007/s13132-023-01410-w
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The acceleration of digital technology development is an important strategic choice to realize the transformation of green innovation. Prior research focuses on the mechanism by which artificial intelligence technology promotes economic growth but ignores the impact of digital technology on green innovation performance. Using panel data on 30 regions in China from 2003 to 2019, this paper examines the impact of digital technology on green innovation performance. The results are as follows: (1) Digital technology can significantly promote green innovation performance. After a series of robustness tests, the conclusion is still valid. (2) Digital technology improves green innovation performance through the green technology upgrading effect, cost reduction effect, and green resource allocation optimization effect. (3) Heterogeneity test results show that in regions with high human capital, high R&D intensity, and strong environmental regulation, the improvement effect of digital technology on green innovation performance is more obvious. These findings not only enrich the literature on digital technology and green innovation performance but also serve as a reference for governmental departments as they optimize their strategy for developing digital technology and achieving green economic development.
引用
收藏
页码:7568 / 7587
页数:20
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [11] Effects of financial development on energy consumption: The role of country risks
    Chiu, Yi-Bin
    Lee, Chien-Chiang
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 90
  • [12] Cui TR., 2022, INFORM SYST J, V1, P1
  • [13] Being 'Green and Competitive': The Impact of Environmental Actions and Collaborations on Firm Performance
    Dangelico, Rosa Maria
    Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 24 (06) : 413 - 430
  • [14] De Haas R., 2019, EUROPEAN CENTRAL BAN
  • [15] Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability?
    Dubey, Rameshwar
    Gunasekaran, Angappa
    Childe, Stephen J.
    Papadopoulos, Thanos
    Luo, Zongwei
    Wamba, Samuel Fosso
    Roubaud, David
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 144 : 534 - 545
  • [16] Economics of Artificial Intelligence: Implications for the Future of Work
    Ernst, Ekkehardt
    Merola, Rossana
    Samaan, Daniel
    [J]. IZA JOURNAL OF LABOR POLICY, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [17] Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China
    Fang, Zhen
    Razzaq, Asif
    Mohsin, Muhammad
    Irfan, Muhammad
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2022, 68
  • [18] Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation
    Feng, Suling
    Zhang, Rong
    Li, Guoxiang
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2022, 61 : 70 - 83
  • [19] Is green and profitable sustainable? Assessing the trade-off between economic and environmental aspects
    Figge, Frank
    Hahn, Tobias
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 140 (01) : 92 - 102
  • [20] Corporate green bonds
    Flammer, Caroline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 142 (02) : 499 - 516