Does Digital Technology Promote Green Innovation Performance?

被引:33
作者
Zhao, Xing [1 ]
Qian, Yuanyuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[2] East China Normal Univ, Fac Econ & Management, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
关键词
Digital technology; Green innovation performance; Technology upgrading; Cost reduction; Green resource allocation optimization; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; PRODUCT INNOVATION; IMPACT; CAPABILITIES; CONSTRAINTS; TRADE; LABOR; ICT;
D O I
10.1007/s13132-023-01410-w
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The acceleration of digital technology development is an important strategic choice to realize the transformation of green innovation. Prior research focuses on the mechanism by which artificial intelligence technology promotes economic growth but ignores the impact of digital technology on green innovation performance. Using panel data on 30 regions in China from 2003 to 2019, this paper examines the impact of digital technology on green innovation performance. The results are as follows: (1) Digital technology can significantly promote green innovation performance. After a series of robustness tests, the conclusion is still valid. (2) Digital technology improves green innovation performance through the green technology upgrading effect, cost reduction effect, and green resource allocation optimization effect. (3) Heterogeneity test results show that in regions with high human capital, high R&D intensity, and strong environmental regulation, the improvement effect of digital technology on green innovation performance is more obvious. These findings not only enrich the literature on digital technology and green innovation performance but also serve as a reference for governmental departments as they optimize their strategy for developing digital technology and achieving green economic development.
引用
收藏
页码:7568 / 7587
页数:20
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities
    Albort-Morant, Gema
    Leal-Millan, Antonio
    Cepeda-Carrion, Gabriel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (11) : 4912 - 4917
  • [2] Do credit constraints favor dirty production? Theory and plant-level evidence
    Andersen, Dana C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 84 : 189 - 208
  • [3] The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry
    Atalay, Murat
    Anafarta, Nilgun
    Sarvan, Fulya
    [J]. SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEADERSHIP, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT (2012), 2013, 75 : 226 - 235
  • [4] Infrastructure and entrepreneurship
    Audretsch, David B.
    Heger, Diana
    Veith, Tobias
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2015, 44 (02) : 219 - 230
  • [5] Real effects of climate policy: Financial constraints and spillovers
    Bartram, Sohnke M.
    Hou, Kewei
    Kim, Sehoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 143 (02) : 668 - 696
  • [6] Brynjolfsson E, 2014, FOREIGN AFF, V93, P44
  • [7] [Румана Бухт Bukht Rumana], 2018, [Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика, International Organisations Research Journal, Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika], V13, P143
  • [8] ICT and productivity: conclusions from the empirical literature
    Cardona, M.
    Kretschmer, T.
    Strobel, T.
    [J]. INFORMATION ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 25 (03) : 109 - 125
  • [9] The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation
    Chang, Ching-Hsun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 104 (03) : 361 - 370
  • [10] Green investment funds and corporate green innovation: From the logic of social value
    Chi, Yi
    Hu, Ning
    Lu, Dong
    Yang, Yang
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 119