A Review of Subjective Scales Measuring the User Experience of Voice Assistants

被引:9
作者
Faruk, Lawal Ibrahim Dutsinma [1 ]
Babakerkhell, Mohammad Dawood [2 ]
Mongkolnam, Pornchai [1 ]
Chongsuphajaisiddhi, Vithida [1 ]
Funilkul, Suree [1 ]
Pal, Debajyoti [3 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Sch Informat Technol, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[2] Shaikh Zayed Univ Khost, Dept Informat Technol, Khost 2501, Afghanistan
[3] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Innovat Cognit Comp Res Ctr IC2, Sch Informat Technol, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
关键词
Factor analysis; reliability; scale; user experience; voice assistant; QUALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; CONSTRUCTION; USABILITY; TRUST;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3358423
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The use of Voice Assistants (VA) in both commercial and personal contexts has experienced significant growth, emphasizing the importance of assessing their user experience (UX) for long-term viability. Currently, the development of appropriate scales that capture user viewpoints after interacting with a system has become a popular method for measuring UX of the Graphical User Interface (GUI) systems. However, the applicability of these scales that are meant for GUI systems on VA is still questionable, hence the need for analyzing the nature of previous scales used for measuring UX of VA. Additionally, in order to keep track of the state of UX research in the VA domain, it is crucial to understand the dimensions of UX that are being utilized. In this study, a comprehensive Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out to identify 21 individual scales used for measuring UX of VA. Furthermore, this study present the evaluation criteria for assessing the rigor of operationalization during the development of these scales. The study analysis reveals that the scales used for measuring UX of VA extends beyond the traditional VUDA (value, usability, desirability, adoptability) principles and incorporates novel aspects such as anthropomorphism and machine personality. Future VA UX researchers should also acknowledge the variations in the rigorous measures employed during scale development, notwithstanding some common and accepted practices. Consequently, an overview is provided, along with suggestions for prospective studies in the field of VA UX research.
引用
收藏
页码:14893 / 14917
页数:25
相关论文
共 129 条
  • [1] Almalki Manal, 2020, Acta Inform Med, V28, P241, DOI 10.5455/aim.2020.28.241-247
  • [2] CRITERION VALIDITY OF A COPING MEASURE
    AMIRKHAN, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1994, 62 (02) : 242 - 261
  • [3] Amith Muhammad, 2020, AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc, V2020, P43
  • [4] Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures
    Anthoine E.
    Moret L.
    Regnault A.
    Sbille V.
    Hardouin J.-B.
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12 (1)
  • [5] What does the literature say about the use of personal voice assistants in older adults? A scoping review
    Arnold, Anneliese
    Kolody, Stephanie
    Comeau, Aidan
    Miguel Cruz, Antonio
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01) : 100 - 111
  • [6] How to Determine the Number of Factors to Retain in Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Comparison of Extraction Methods Under Realistic Conditions
    Auerswald, Max
    Moshagen, Morten
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2019, 24 (04) : 468 - 491
  • [7] Bandara W, 2015, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V37, P154
  • [8] Bargas-Avila JA, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P2689
  • [9] Berdasco A, 2019, PROCEEDINGS, V31, P51
  • [10] Bernhaupt R., 2018, Using Speech To Search: Comparing Built-in and Ambient Speech Search in Terms of Privacy and User Experience