SITUATIONAL INEQUALITIES IN THE PANDEMIC AND FEATURES OF OLDER PEOPLE IN POST-PANDEMIC TIME

被引:0
作者
Galkin, Konstantin [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Fed Ctr Theoret & Appl Sociol, Sociol Inst, St Petersburg, Russia
来源
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY STUDIES | 2023年 / 21卷 / 03期
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
inequalities; elderly people; adaptation of elderly people in post-pandemic time; individual perception of inequalities; situational inequalities; INTERSECTIONALITY; AGEISM;
D O I
10.17323/727-0634-2023-21-3-519-538
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
This article examines situational inequalities that arose during the pandemic and the peculiarities of older people's adaptation to them in the post-pandemic period. The research focuses on everyday projections of inequalities of older people living separately in a federal city and rural areas. In order to look at inequalities, the work uses microsociological optics, which has made it possible to analyze how structural inequalities affect the lives of the elderly and what are the possibilities of adaptation after the pandemic that has triggered the processes of protection and self-preservation. The empirical basis of the study is 30 semi structured interviews conducted in 2022 in the federal city of St. Petersburg and villages of the Republic of Karelia. As the main inequalities, the article describes situational inequalities, such as digital inequalities, inequalities in access to and receipt of information, spatial inequalities, and inequalities in access to health care. It is shown that emotional reflection on the past, the presence of hobbies or the emergence of new ones, the revision of previous resources, types of communication and ways of solving problems, the shift of emphasis from caring for family and relatives to caring for oneself create positive opportunities for adaptation, reduce the fears and worries of older people about the return of the COVID-19 pandemic situation and the inequalities it creates.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 538
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Abbey Ruth, 2009, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, V7, P225, DOI 10.1108/14779960911004480
[2]   INEQUALITY AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE - COMPARISON OF MARX AND WEBER [J].
BENDIX, R .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1974, 39 (02) :149-161
[3]  
Brinkmann Svend., 2018, DOING INTERVIEWS, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781529716665
[4]   AGE-ISM . ANOTHER FORM OF BIGOTRY [J].
BUTLER, RN .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1969, 9 (4P1) :243-&
[5]   Beyond Successful Aging 2.0: Inequalities, Ageism, and the Case for Normalizing Old Ages [J].
Calasanti, Toni ;
King, Neal .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2021, 76 (09) :1817-1827
[7]  
Chupryna O. G., 2020, Questions of Cognitive Linguistics, P94
[8]  
Collins Randall., 2005, INTERACTION RITUAL C
[9]  
Dill B. T., 2020, Critical Thinking about Inequality: An Emerging Lens Feminist Theory Reader
[10]   Talking city trouble: Interactional vandalism, social inequality, and the "urban interaction problem" [J].
Duneier, M ;
Molotch, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1999, 104 (05) :1263-1295