Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry

被引:22
作者
Hutton, Todd M. [1 ]
Aaronson, Scott T. [2 ,3 ]
Carpenter, Linda L. [4 ,5 ]
Pages, Kenneth [6 ]
Krantz, David [7 ]
Lucas, Lindsay [7 ]
Chen, Bing [7 ]
Sackeim, Harold A. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Southern Calif TMS Ctr, Pasadena, CA USA
[2] Sheppard Pratt Hlth Syst, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Psychiat, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Butler Hosp, Providence, RI USA
[5] Brown Univ, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Providence, RI USA
[6] TMS South Tampa, Tampa, FL USA
[7] NAMSA, St Louis Pk, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY USA
[9] Columbia Univ, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); Efficacy; Treatment duration; Number of sessions; Registry; UNILATERAL ELECTROCONVULSIVE-THERAPY; ELECTRODE PLACEMENT; TREATMENT-RESISTANT; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; DOUBLE-BLIND; EFFICACY; MULTISITE; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTORS; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2023.10.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The number of sessions in an acute TMS course for major depressive disorder (MDD) is greater than in the earlier randomized controlled trials. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in groups that received differing numbers of TMS sessions.Methods: From a registry sample (N = 13,732), data were extracted for 7215 patients treated for MDD with PHQ9 assessments before and after their TMS course. Groups were defined by number of acute course treatment sessions: 1-19 (N = 658), 20-29 (N = 616), 30-35 (N = 1375), 36 (N = 3591), 37-41 (N = 626), or >41 (N = 349) and compared in clinical outcomes at endpoint and at fixed intervals (after 10, 20, 30, and 36 sessions). The impact of additional treatments beyond 36 sessions was also examined.Results: Groups that received fewer than 30 sessions had inferior endpoint outcomes than all other groups. PHQ-9 symptom reduction was greatest in the group that ended treatment at 36 sessions. The extended treatment groups (>36 sessions) differed from all other groups by manifesting less antidepressant response early in the course and had a slower but steady rate of improvement over time. Extending treatment beyond 36 sessions was associated with further improvement without evidence of a plateau.Conclusions: In real-world practice, there are strong relations between the number of TMS sessions in a course and the magnitude of symptom reduction. Courses with less than 30 sessions are associated with diminished benefit. Patients with longer than standard courses typically show less initial improvement and a more gradual trajectory, but meaningful benefit accrues with treatment beyond 36 sessions.
引用
收藏
页码:1510 / 1521
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Comparison of clinical outcomes with left unilateral and sequential bilateral Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) treatment of major depressive disorder in a large patient registry
    Aaronson, Scott T.
    Carpenter, Linda L.
    Hutton, Todd M.
    Kraus, Stacia
    Mina, Miriam
    Pages, Kenneth
    Shi, Luoxi
    West, W. Scott
    Sackeim, Harold A.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2022, 15 (02) : 326 - 336
  • [2] Aetna, 2022, Transcranial magnetic stimulation and Cranial Electrical stimulation
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, Am J Psychiatry, V157, P1
  • [4] Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder: Clinical response in an open-label extension trial
    Avery, David H.
    Isenberg, Keith E.
    Sampson, Shirlene M.
    Janicak, Philip G.
    Lisanby, Sarah H.
    Maixner, Daniel F.
    Loo, Colleen
    Thase, Michael E.
    Demitrack, Mark A.
    George, Mark S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 69 (03) : 441 - 451
  • [5] A roadmap to using randomization in clinical trials
    Berger, Vance W.
    Bour, Louis Joseph
    Carter, Kerstine
    Chipman, Jonathan J.
    Everett, Colin C.
    Heussen, Nicole
    Hewitt, Catherine
    Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter
    Luo, Yuqun Abigail
    Renteria, Jone
    Ryeznik, Yevgen
    Sverdlov, Oleksandr
    Uschner, Diane
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [6] Response, remission and drop-out rates following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials
    Berlim, M. T.
    van den Eynde, F.
    Tovar-Perdomo, S.
    Daskalakis, Z. J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2014, 44 (02) : 225 - 239
  • [7] METAANALYSIS OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC DOSE-RESPONSE DATA
    BERLIN, JA
    LONGNECKER, MP
    GREENLAND, S
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 4 (03) : 218 - 228
  • [8] Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    Vila-Rodriguez, Fidel
    Thorpe, Kevin E.
    Feffer, Kfir
    Noda, Yoshihiro
    Giacobbe, Peter
    Knyahnytska, Yuliya
    Kennedy, Sidney H.
    Lam, Raymond W.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Downar, Jonathan
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 391 (10131) : 1683 - 1692
  • [9] Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation: a meta analysis
    Burt, T
    Lisanby, SH
    Sackeim, HA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 5 (01) : 73 - 103
  • [10] Comparison of clinical outcomes with two Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation treatment protocols for major depressive disorder
    Carpenter, Linda L.
    Aaronson, Scott T.
    Hutton, Todd M.
    Mina, Miriam
    Pages, Kenneth
    Verdoliva, Sarah
    West, W. Scott
    Sackeim, Harold A.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (01) : 173 - 180