Can environmental monitoring power transition curb corporate greenwashing behavior?

被引:71
作者
Zhang, Dongyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Univ & Econ & Business, Sch Econ, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological environmental monitoring power; withdrawal; Greenwashing; Financial constraint; Continuous DID; GREEN INNOVATION PERFORMANCE; ENFORCEMENT; POLLUTION; INCENTIVES; ADVANTAGE; ECONOMICS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2023.05.034
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To address ecological, climate and environmental issues in sustainable growth, local eco-logical environmental monitoring power withdrawal (EEMPW) by the Chinese State Council has been implemented since 2015. This paper aims to comprehensively investigate how the centralization of national environmental quality monitoring policy via the EEMPW affects corporate greenwashing behavior, and evaluate the reacting mechanisms. The empirical findings derived by the continuous difference-in-differences models show that the EEMPW significantly curbs firms' hypocritical greenwashing behaviors, and by increasing financial constraint level, the greenwashing behaviors can be significantly reduced. This paper finds that firms in cleaner production industries, firms in regions with highly developed green finance, firms in highly environmentally regulated areas, and state-owned enterprises are more restrained in greenwashing. Furthermore, our mechanism analyses show that finan-cially constrained firms reduce their likelihood of greenwashing behavior by compressing management and financial costs, and facilitating green innovation efficiency behaviors. Our findings provide suggestions for curbing greenwashing behaviors and for improving the ef-ficiency of the government regulation of ecological, climate and environmental targets in economic growth. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 218
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Green Innovation and Financial Performance: An Institutional Approach [J].
Aguilera-Caracuel, Javier ;
Ortiz-de-Mandojana, Natalia .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 26 (04) :365-385
[2]   The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities [J].
Albort-Morant, Gema ;
Leal-Millan, Antonio ;
Cepeda-Carrion, Gabriel .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (11) :4912-4917
[3]  
Ambec I., 2006, Energy Studies Review, V14, P42, DOI DOI 10.15173/ESR.V14I2.493
[4]   The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics [J].
Angrist, Joshua D. ;
Pischke, Joern-Steffen .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 24 (02) :3-30
[5]   Greenwashing and product market competition [J].
Arouri, Mohamed ;
El Ghoul, Sadok ;
Gomes, Mathieu .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 42
[6]   Does Greenwashing Pay Off? Understanding the Relationship Between Environmental Actions and Environmental Legitimacy [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Fosfuri, Andrea ;
Gelabert, Liliana .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 144 (02) :363-379
[7]   Managing green brand equity: the perspective of perceived risk theory [J].
Chang, Ching-Hsun ;
Chen, Yu-Shan .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2014, 48 (03) :1753-1768
[8]   The driver of green innovation and green image - Green core competence [J].
Chen, Yu-Shan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2008, 81 (03) :531-543
[9]   The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan [J].
Chen, Yu-Shan ;
Lai, Shyh-Bao ;
Wen, Chao-Tung .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2006, 67 (04) :331-339
[10]   The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan [J].
Chiou, Tzu-Yun ;
Chan, Hing Kai ;
Lettice, Fiona ;
Chung, Sai Ho .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2011, 47 (06) :822-836