Impact of Government Subsidies, Competition, and Blockchain on Green Supply Chain Decisions

被引:10
作者
Song, Jinxuan [1 ]
Yan, Xu [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Sport, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao 266061, Peoples R China
关键词
government subsidies; green technology innovation; competing games; blockchain; INNOVATION SUBSIDY; TECHNOLOGY; COOPERATION; INVESTMENT; COORDINATION; COOPETITION; CHALLENGES; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.3390/su15043633
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
At present, environmental and competitive pressures urge enterprises to engage in research and development (R&D) of green products, and a green supply chain has become the main trend in the sustainable development of enterprises. This study analyzes the optimal operation decisions of a green supply chain for two manufacturers under different competitive and cooperative relationships, considering factors such as government subsidies, consumer green preferences, and the impact of the green information trust. The results show that government subsidies can lead to higher social welfare when manufacturers have a cooperative relationship, but the optimal choice of subsidies (for R&D costs or product production costs) depends on the level of competition and the difficulty of R&D. For the manufacturers, the optimal choice of R&D strategy (individual or joint) and the use of blockchain technology also depends on the level of difficulty of R&D and the type of government subsidies. Overall, this study highlights the importance of considering various factors when making decisions in a green supply chain to achieve the best outcomes for all parties involved.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Green Supply Chain Management Practices of Firms with Competitive Strategic Alliances-A Study of the Automobile Industry [J].
Abbas, Hassan ;
Tong, Shu .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)
[2]   Understanding the human side of openness: the fit between open innovation modes and CEO characteristics [J].
Ahn, Joon Mo ;
Minshall, Tim ;
Mortara, Letizia .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2017, 47 (05) :727-740
[3]   Barriers to adoption of blockchain technology in green supply chain management [J].
Bag, Surajit ;
Viktorovich, Dmitriev Aleksandr ;
Sahu, Atul Kumar ;
Sahu, Anoop Kumar .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPERATIONS AND STRATEGIC SOURCING, 2021, 14 (01) :104-133
[4]   The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Song, Siyi ;
Jiao, Jianling ;
Yang, Ranran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 (819-829) :819-829
[5]   Optimal Pricing and Greening Strategy in a Competitive Green Supply Chain: Impact of Government Subsidy and Tax Policy [J].
Barman, Abhijit ;
Das, Rubi ;
De, Pijus Kanti ;
Sana, Shib Sankar .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (16)
[6]   Manufacturer vs. Consumer Subsidy with Green Technology Investment and Environmental Concern [J].
Bian, Junsong ;
Zhang, Guoqing ;
Zhou, Guanghui .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 287 (03) :832-843
[7]   Technology partnership portfolios and firm innovation performance: Further evidence [J].
Carree, Martin ;
Lokshin, Boris ;
Alvarez, Harold Alvarez .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 54 :1-11
[8]   Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain [J].
Centobelli, Piera ;
Cerchione, Roberto ;
Del Vecchio, Pasquale ;
Oropallo, Eugenio ;
Secundo, Giustina .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 59 (07)
[9]   Optimal production and subsidy rate considering dynamic consumer green perception under different government subsidy orientations [J].
Chen, Shan ;
Su, Jiafu ;
Wu, Yingbo ;
Zhou, Fuli .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 168
[10]   Firms' green R&D cooperation behaviour in a supply chain: Technological spillover, power and coordination [J].
Chen, Xu ;
Wang, Xiaojun ;
Zhou, Mingmei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 218 :118-134