The potential of combining satellite and airborne remote sensing data for habitat classification and monitoring in forest landscapes

被引:21
作者
Iglseder, Anna [1 ]
Immitzer, Markus [2 ]
Dostalova, Alena
Kasper, Andreas [3 ]
Pfeifer, Norbert [1 ]
Bauerhansl, Christoph [4 ]
Schotl, Stefan
Hollaus, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] TU Wien, Dept Geodesy & Geoinformat, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Geomat, Vienna BOKU, Peter Jordan Str 82, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[3] Environm Protect Vienna MA22, Municipal Dept 22, Dresdner Str 45, A-1200 Vienna, Austria
[4] Austrian Res Ctr Forests, Unit Remote Sensing, Seckendorff Gudent Weg 8, A-1130 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Habitat Mapping; Natura; 2000; Airborne Laser Scanning; Sentinel-1; Sentinel-2; Random Forest; NATURA; 2000; HABITATS; WAVE-FORM; LIDAR DATA; VEGETATION STRUCTURE; IMAGERY; INDEX; SUCCESSION; ACCURACY; COVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jag.2022.103131
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Mapping and monitoring of habitats are requirements for protecting biodiversity. In this study, we investigated the benefit of combining airborne (laser scanning, image-based point clouds) and satellite-based (Sentinel 1 and 2) data for habitat classification. We used a two level random forest 10-fold leave-location-out cross-validation workflow to model Natura 2000 forest and grassland habitat types on a 10 m pixel scale at two study sites in Vienna, Austria. We showed that models using combined airborne and satellite-based remote sensing data perform significantly better for forests than airborne or satellite-based data alone. For frequently occurring classes, we reached class accuracies with F1-scores from 0.60 to 0.87. We identified clear difficulties of correctly assigning rare classes with model-based classification. Finally, we demonstrated the potential of the workflow to identify errors in reference data and point to the opportunities for integration in habitat mapping and monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Classification of vegetation in an open landscape using full-waveform airborne laser scanner data [J].
Alexander, Cici ;
Deak, Balazs ;
Kania, Adam ;
Muecke, Werner ;
Heilmeier, Hermann .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2015, 41 :76-87
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Climate change and health
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, QGIS GEOGR INF SYST
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, VL20611, P7
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, The R Project for Statistical Computing, R version 4.2.0
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INT MAN EUR UN HAB
[7]   LiDAR as a rapid tool to predict forest habitat types in Natura 2000 networks [J].
Baessler, Claus ;
Stadler, Jutta ;
Mueller, Joerg ;
Foerster, Bernhard ;
Goettlein, Axel ;
Brandl, Roland .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2011, 20 (03) :465-481
[8]   Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions [J].
Belgiu, Mariana ;
Dragut, Lucian .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 :24-31
[9]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[10]   Potential of Sentinel-1 C-Band Time Series to Derive Structural Parameters of Temperate Deciduous Forests [J].
Bruggisser, Moritz ;
Dorigo, Wouter ;
Dostalova, Alena ;
Hollaus, Markus ;
Navacchi, Claudio ;
Schlaffer, Stefan ;
Pfeifer, Norbert .
REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (04) :1-30