Legitimation in government social media communication: the case of the Brexit department

被引:17
作者
Hansson, Sten [1 ]
Page, Ruth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept English Language & Linguist, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Legitimisation; government communication; blame avoidance; social media; Twitter; Brexit; argumentation; rationalisation; BLAME AVOIDANCE; DISCOURSE; TWITTER; STRATEGIES; ARGUMENTATION; AUDIENCES; CAMPAIGNS; FACEBOOK; TWEETS; WORDS;
D O I
10.1080/17405904.2022.2058971
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
When governments introduce controversial policies or face a risk of policy failure, officeholders try to avoid blame and justify their decisions by using various legitimation strategies. This paper focuses on the ways in which legitimations are expressed in government social media communication, using the Twitter posts of the British government's Brexit department as an example. We show how governments may seek legitimacy by appealing to (1) the personal authority of individual policymakers, (2) the collective authority of (political) organisations, (3) the impersonal authority of rules or documents, (4) the goals or effects of government policy, (5) 'the will of the people', and (6) time pressure. The results suggest that official legitimations in social media posts tend to rely more on references to authority and shared values rather than presentation of evidence and sound arguments.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 378
页数:18
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Elite Tweets: Analyzing the Twitter Communication Patterns of Labour Party Peers in the House of Lords [J].
Adi, Ana ;
Erickson, Kristofer ;
Lilleker, Darren G. .
POLICY AND INTERNET, 2014, 6 (01) :1-27
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SOCIAL MEDIA GUIDANC
[3]  
Bennett S, 2019, DIS APPL POL SOC CUL, V83, P229, DOI 10.1075/dapsac.83.10ben
[4]   Legitimation of value practices, value texts, and core values at public authorities [J].
Bjorkvall, Anders ;
Hoog, Catharina Nystrom .
DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATION, 2019, 13 (04) :398-414
[5]   The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US Election [J].
Bossetta, Michael .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2018, 95 (02) :471-496
[6]   False reasoning and argumentation in the Twitter discourse of the Prime Minister of Israel [J].
Boukala, Salomi .
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AGGRESSION AND CONFLICT, 2018, 6 (01) :58-78
[7]  
Bouko C., 2019, Discourses of Brexit, P171
[8]  
Bouvier Gwen., 2020, TWITTER PUBLIC SPHER
[9]  
Buckledee S, 2018, LANGUAGE OF BREXIT: HOW BRITAIN TALKED ITS WAY OUT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, P1
[10]  
Charteris-Black J., 2019, Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake