Effect of Karst Microhabitats on the Structure and Function of the Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Community of Rhododendron pudingense

被引:7
|
作者
Yuan, Congjun [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Haodong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dai, Xiaoyong [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Meng [1 ]
Luo, Jun [1 ]
Yang, Rui [3 ]
Ding, Fangjun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Acad Forestry, Guiyang 550005, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Positioning Observat & Res Stn Guizhou Libo K, Libo 558403, Peoples R China
[3] Guizhou Univ, Coll Forestry, Guiyang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
karst microhabitat; Rhododendron pudingense; rhizosphere; soil microbes; community structure diversity; high-throughput sequencing; FOREST; DIVERSITY; LITTER; NUTRIENTS; ABUNDANCE; ROOTS; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/su15097104
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil microbes play an important role in the microbial circulation and energy flow of ecosystems. In order to understand the change in the rhizosphere soil microbial community structure and function in the heterogeneous karst habitats, the nutrient content and enzyme activity were analyzed, and Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology was used to detect the composition, quantity and functional types of the rhizosphere soil microbial community in Rhododendron pudingense under three kinds of karst microhabitats (soil surface, rock gully and rock surface) in Wangmo Country (WM), Zhenning Country (ZN) and Qinglong Country (QL). The results showed that SS and RG microhabitats had a higher nutrient content and enzyme activity, while RS had the lowest. At the phylum level, Proteobacteria and Actinomycetes were dominant in terms of bacteria, while Ascomycota and Basidiomycotina were dominant in terms of fungi. There was no significant difference in microbial diversity among different karst microhabitats (p > 0.05). At the microbial genus level, there were some differences in species composition among the three karst microhabitats, which may lead to soil heterogeneity in karst microhabitats. WM was a little different from ZN and QL. The results of PCoA showed that the community composition of RG and RS was more similar to that of SS. There was no significant difference in microbial functional types among different microhabitats (p > 0.05). Only the abundance of pathothoph-symbiothoph fungi in RG was significantly higher than that in RS (p < 0.05). The main function of bacteria was metabolism, and saprophytic and symbiotic fungi were the dominant fungal group. In conclusion, soil organic carbon and alkaline phosphatase are important factors affecting the level distribution of microflora in different karst microhabitats. R. pudingense in the SS and RG microhabitats has better soil conditions, which may require protection for the plants in the RS microhabitat. The current study results can provide a theoretical basis for the adaptation mechanism of Rhododendron pudingense to the karst microhabitat.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of soil microbial community structure and function for karst tiankeng with different degrees of degradation
    Jiang, Cong
    Zeng, Hui
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [2] Dynamic Changes of Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Community Along A Karst Coniferous Plantation Chronosequence
    He, Bin
    Li, Qing
    Li, Wangjun
    Zou, Shun
    Bai, Xiaolong
    Chen, Yang
    JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2024, 24 (04) : 7398 - 7417
  • [3] Impacts of bulk soil microbial community structure on rhizosphere microbiomes of Zea mays
    Bakker, Matthew G.
    Chaparro, Jacqueline M.
    Manter, Daniel K.
    Vivanco, Jorge M.
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2015, 392 (1-2) : 115 - 126
  • [4] Rhizodeposition shapes rhizosphere microbial community structure in organic soil
    Paterson, Eric
    Gebbing, Thomas
    Abel, Claire
    Sim, Allan
    Telfer, Gillian
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2007, 173 (03) : 600 - 610
  • [5] The Effect of Forest Thinning on Soil Microbial Community Structure and Function
    Wu, Ran
    Cheng, Xiaoqin
    Han, Hairong
    FORESTS, 2019, 10 (04)
  • [6] Soil microbial community responses to sulfadiazine-contaminated manure in different soil microhabitats
    Reichel, Ruediger
    Patzelt, Diana
    Barleben, Christoph
    Rosendahl, Ingrid
    Ellerbrock, Ruth H.
    Thiele-Bruhn, Soeren
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2014, 80 : 15 - 25
  • [7] Mixed grass species differ in rhizosphere microbial community structure and function response to drought compared to monocultures
    Xiao, Lie
    Ma, Yuanyuan
    Yuwen, Peiyao
    Du, Dandan
    Li, Peng
    Sun, Caili
    Xue, Sha
    RHIZOSPHERE, 2022, 24
  • [8] Effect of Drought Stress and Developmental Stages on Microbial Community Structure and Diversity in Peanut Rhizosphere Soil
    Dai, Liangxiang
    Zhang, Guanchu
    Yu, Zipeng
    Ding, Hong
    Xu, Yang
    Zhang, Zhimeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2019, 20 (09)
  • [9] Differences in rhizosphere soil microbial function and community structure in invasive weed Bidens pilosa and native weeds
    Luo, Shasha
    Shen, Dachun
    Lu, Yinglin
    Li, Jihu
    Sun, Donglei
    An, Yuxing
    SCIENCEASIA, 2023, 49 (06): : 888 - 898
  • [10] Microbial Community Structure and Function in Peat Soil
    Mandic-Mulec, Ines
    Ausec, Luka
    Danevcic, Tjasa
    Levicnik-Hoefferle, Spela
    Jerman, Vesna
    Kraigher, Barbara
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 52 (02) : 180 - 187