Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study

被引:2
作者
Maki, Takumi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Irisawa, Atsushi [1 ,3 ]
Yamamiya, Akira [3 ]
Tominaga, Keiichi [3 ]
Abe, Yoko [1 ,3 ]
Imbe, Koh [1 ]
Hoshi, Koki [1 ,3 ]
Yamabe, Akane [1 ,3 ]
Igarashi, Ryo [1 ]
Nakajima, Yuki [1 ]
Sato, Kentaro [1 ]
Shibukawa, Goro [1 ]
机构
[1] Fukushima Med Univ, Aizu Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, 21-2 Kawahigashi Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima 9693482, Japan
[2] Minamiaizu Prefectural Hosp, Dept Internal Med, 14-1 Nagata Minamiaizu, Fukushima 9670006, Japan
[3] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Sch Med, 880 Kitakobayashi Mibu, Mibu, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
关键词
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; trainee; wire-guided cannulation; POST-ERCP PANCREATITIS; BILE-DUCT; CANNULATION TECHNIQUE; BILIARY CANNULATION; SPHINCTEROTOMY; PREVENTION; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12082917
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a selective biliary cannulation technique aimed at improving the successful selective biliary cannulation rate and reducing the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of angled-tip guidewires (AGW) vs. straight-tip guidewires (SGW) for biliary cannulation via WGC by a trainee. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, open-labeled, randomized, and controlled trial. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in this study and assigned randomly to two groups (Group A to S and Group S to A). In this study, we started selective biliary cannulation via WGC with an AGW or an SGW for 7 min. If cannulation was unsuccessful, the other guidewire was used, and cannulation was continued for another 7 min (cross-over method). Results: The selective biliary cannulation success rate over 14 min was significantly higher with an AGW compared with an SGW over 14 min (57.8% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.04) and for the second 7-min segment (36.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). No significant difference was found for adverse events such as pancreatitis between the two guidewires. Conclusions: Our results suggest that an AGW is recommended for WGC performed by a trainee.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of Post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation
    Artifon, Everson L. A.
    Sakai, Paulo
    Cunha, Jose E. M.
    Halwan, Bhawna
    Ishioka, Shinichi
    Kumar, Atul
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (10) : 2147 - 2153
  • [2] Utilization pattern of prophylactic measures for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a National Survey Study
    Ashat, Munish
    Kandula, Sailesh
    Cote, Gregory A.
    Gromski, Mark A.
    Fogel, Evan L.
    Sherman, Stuart
    Lehman, Glen A.
    Watkins, James L.
    Bick, Benjamin L.
    Easler, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : 1059 - 1069
  • [3] A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis
    Bailey, A. A.
    Bourke, M. J.
    Williams, S. J.
    Walsh, P. R.
    Murray, M. A.
    Lee, E. Y. T.
    Kwan, V.
    Lynch, P. M.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 40 (04) : 296 - 301
  • [4] Biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: core technique and recent innovations
    Bourke, M. J.
    Costamagna, G.
    Freeman, M. L.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (07) : 612 - 617
  • [5] Can a Wire-Guided Cannulation Technique Increase Bile Duct Cannulation Rate and Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis?: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Cennamo, Vincenzo
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Zagari, Rocco M.
    Eusebi, Leonardo H.
    Ceroni, Liza
    Laterza, Liboria
    Fabbri, Carlo
    Bazzoli, Franco
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (09) : 2343 - 2350
  • [6] Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective multicenter study
    Cheng, CL
    Sherman, S
    Watkins, JL
    Barnett, J
    Freeman, M
    Geenen, J
    Ryan, M
    Parker, H
    Frakes, JT
    Fogel, EL
    Silverman, WB
    Dua, KS
    Aliperti, G
    Yakshe, P
    Uzer, M
    Jones, W
    Goff, J
    Lazzell-Pannell, L
    Rashdan, A
    Temkit, M
    Lehman, GA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (01) : 139 - 147
  • [7] Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheung, Justin
    Tsoi, Kelvin K.
    Quan, Wai-Leong
    Lau, James Y. W.
    Sung, Joseph J. Y.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 70 (06) : 1211 - 1219
  • [8] ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS
    COTTON, PB
    LEHMAN, G
    VENNES, J
    GEENEN, JE
    RUSSELL, RCG
    MEYERS, WC
    LIGUORY, C
    NICKL, N
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) : 383 - 393
  • [9] ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
    Dumonceau, Jean-Marc
    Kapral, Christine
    Aabakken, Lars
    Papanikolaou, Ioannis S.
    Tringali, Andrea
    Vanbiervliet, Geoffroy
    Beyna, Torsten
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Hritz, Istvan
    Mariani, Alberto
    Paspatis, Gregorios
    Radaelli, Franco
    Lakhtakia, Sundeep
    Veitch, Andrew M.
    van Hooft, Jeanin E.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 52 (02) : 127 - 149
  • [10] Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Updated June 2014
    Dumonceau, Jean-Marc
    Andriulli, Angelo
    Elmunzer, B. Joseph
    Mariani, Alberto
    Meister, Tobias
    Deviere, Jacques
    Marek, Tomasz
    Baron, Todd H.
    Hassan, Cesare
    Testoni, Pier A.
    Kapral, Christine
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (09) : 798 - 814