Do Different Types of Adhesive Agents Effect Enamel Demineralization for Orthodontic Bonding? An In Vitro Study

被引:7
|
作者
Demircioglu, Raif Murat [1 ]
Cicek, Orhan [1 ]
Comert, Fusun [2 ]
Erener, Hande [3 ]
机构
[1] Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-67100 Zonguldak, Turkiye
[2] Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Microbiol, TR-67630 Zonguldak, Turkiye
[3] Tekirdag Namik Kemal Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-59030 Tekirdag, Turkiye
关键词
orthodontics; bracket; adhesive; bond; artificial saliva; Streptococcus mutans; cariogenic environment; demineralization; DIAGNOdent; SELF-ETCHING PRIMER; WHITE SPOT LESIONS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PHOSPHORIC-ACID; CARIES; COMPOSITE; BRACKETS;
D O I
10.3390/coatings13020401
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
(1) Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the demineralization around brackets bonded with different types of adhesive agents in a cariogenic suspension environment. (2) Methods: In the study, 60 extracted upper first premolar teeth were divided into three groups with 20 teeth in each group. In Group 1, Transbond XT Primer + Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), in Group 2, GC Ortho Connect Light Cure Adhesive (GC Crop, Tokyo, Japan) and in Group 3, Transbond (TM) Plus Self Etching Primer + Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) adhesive agents were used. In Group 1 and 2, buccal enamel surfaces were etched for 30 s, washed for 15 s and dried for 15 s. All groups were bonded with Gemini metal (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) brackets. Gingival, occlusal and proximal enamel surfaces of the brackets were measured with a DIAGNOdent pen (KaVo, Biberach, Germany), and demineralization values were recorded. Measurements were performed after bracketing (T0) and after 28 days in a cariogenic environment (T1), which was renewed every 48 h. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine whether or not the data were homogeneously distributed, the Wilcoxon test was used for comparisons within groups, and the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons between groups. (3) Results: In all groups, demineralization values on all enamel surfaces of the brackets were found to be statistically significantly higher in the T1 period than in the T0 period (p < 0.05). In the T1 period, demineralization values of occlusal enamel surfaces in Groups 1 and 2 were found to be significantly higher than in Group 3 (p < 0.05). The amount of increase in occlusal enamel surface demineralization value between T0 and T1 periods in Groups 1 and 2 was significantly higher than in Group 3 (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in demineralization values of proximal and gingival enamel surfaces between the groups in the T1 period (p > 0.05). (4) Conclusion: Significantly less occlusal enamel surface demineralization was observed in teeth in which the Transbond (TM) Plus Self Etching Primer adhesive agent was not applied with acid etching.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the Demineralization Development around Different Types of Orthodontic Brackets
    Ertop, Melis Toz
    Cicek, Orhan
    Erener, Hande
    Ozkalayci, Nurhat
    Cicek, Busra Demir
    Comert, Fusun
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [2] Effect of different bonding agents on prevention of enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets
    Paschos, Ekaterini
    Kleinschrodt, Thomas
    Clementino-Luedemann, Tatiana
    Huth, Karin C.
    Hickel, Reinhard
    Kunzelmann, Karl-Heinz
    Rudzki-Janson, Ingrid
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 135 (05) : 603 - 612
  • [3] Assessment of Enamel Demineralization Following the Use of Different Orthodontic Bracket Materials, Etchants, and Adhesive Systems: An In Vitro Study
    Zawawi, Rahaf
    Almosa, Naif
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2023, 13 (07) : 837 - 847
  • [4] Effects of different orthodontic primers on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets
    Baysal, Asli
    Yasa, Bilal
    Sogut, Ozlem
    Ozturk, Mehmet Ali
    Uysal, Tancan
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2015, 76 (05): : 421 - 430
  • [5] Enamel demineralization around two different orthodontic bracket adhesive systems: An in vivo study
    Almosa, Naif A.
    Alqasir, Abdulmohsen M.
    Aldekhayyil, Mohammad A.
    Aljelayel, Abdullah
    Aldosari, Mohammed A.
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 31 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [6] Effects of different topical agents on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets: an in vivo and in vitro study
    Uysal, T.
    Amasyali, M.
    Koyuturk, A. E.
    Ozcan, S.
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2010, 55 (03) : 268 - 274
  • [7] Different Orthodontic Adhesive Systems and Enamel Demineralization Around Metal Brackets Assessed by a Laser Fluorescence Device (A Comparative an in-vitro study)
    Hatf, Ahmed Dhiaa
    AL-Khatieeb, Mustafa M.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 8 (07): : 16 - 23
  • [8] Evaluation of different enamel conditioning techniques for orthodontic bonding
    Turkoz, Cagri
    Ulusoy, Cagri
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 42 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [9] Effect of fluoride-releasing 4-META/MMA-TBB resin on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets: An in vitro μCT analysis
    Koike, Sarina
    Hamba, Hidenori
    Tagami, Junji
    Ono, Takashi
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2021, 40 (05) : 1243 - 1249
  • [10] Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study
    Eser, Irfan
    Cicek, Orhan
    Ozkalayci, Nurhat
    Yetmez, Mehmet
    Erener, Hande
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (02)