REPORTing of Antimicrobial Resistance from Blood Cultures (REPORT-ABC), an ARLG Survey Summary: Resistance Marker Reporting Practices from Positive Blood Cultures

被引:14
作者
Simner, Patricia J. [1 ,2 ]
Bard, Jennifer Dien [3 ]
Doern, Christopher [4 ]
Johnson, J. Kristie [5 ]
Westblade, Lars [6 ,7 ]
Yenokyan, Gayane [8 ]
Patel, Robin [9 ,10 ]
Hanson, Kimberly E. [11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Childrens Hosp Los Angeles, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Pathol, Richmond, VA USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[6] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, New York, NY USA
[7] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, New York, NY USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Johns Hopkins Biostat Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
[9] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Div Clin Microbiol, Rochester, MN USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Div Publ Hlth Infect Dis & Occupat Med, Dept Med, Rochester, MN USA
[11] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Med, Infect Dis Div, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[12] Univ Utah, Associated Reg & Univ Pathologists ARUP Labs, Dept Pathol, Clin Microbiol Div, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
antimicrobial resistance test result reporting; multiplex molecular panels; blood cultures; AMR marker reporting; IDENTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciac952
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Approaches to reporting molecular antibacterial resistance test results from positive blood culture broths vary across clinical laboratories. Some current practices may undermine the value of the tests used. We provide recommendations for reporting identification and resistance from positive blood cultures. Background We assessed how laboratories use and handle reporting of results of rapid diagnostics performed on positive blood culture broths, with a focus on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) markers. Methods A survey assembled by the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group Diagnostics Committee was circulated from December 2020 to May 2021. The survey was sent to local hospitals, shared on the ClinMicroNet and Division C listservs, and included in a College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey. Results Ninety-six laboratories of various sizes across the United States (95%) and outside of the United States (5%) participated. Of the laboratories that had at least 1 rapid diagnostic in place (94%), significant heterogeneity in methods used and reporting practices was found across community (52%) and academic (40%) laboratories serving hospitals of various sizes. Respondents had implemented 1 to 6 different panels/platforms for a total of 31 permutations. Methods of reporting rapid organism identification and AMR results varied from listing all targets as "detected"/"not detected" (16-22%) without interpretive guidance, to interpreting results (23-42%), or providing therapeutic guidance comments to patient-facing healthcare teams (3-17%). Conclusions Current approaches to reporting molecular AMR test results from positive blood culture vary significantly across clinical laboratories. Providing interpretative comments with therapeutic guidance alongside results reported may assist clinicians who are not well-versed in genetic mechanisms of AMR. However, this is currently not being done in all clinical laboratories. Standardized strategies for AMR gene result reporting are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1550 / 1558
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories
    Akerlund, Anna
    Jonasson, Emma
    Matuschek, Erika
    Serrander, Lena
    Sundqvist, Martin
    Kahlmeter, Gunnar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 75 (11) : 3230 - 3238
  • [2] Parallel Evaluation of the MALDI Sepsityper and Verigene BC-GN Assays for Rapid Identification of Gram-Negative Bacilli from Positive Blood Cultures
    Arroyo, Miguel A.
    Denys, Gerald A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (09) : 2708 - 2718
  • [3] Randomized Trial of Rapid Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Blood Culture Identification and Susceptibility Testing
    Banerjee, Ritu
    Teng, Christine B.
    Cunningham, Scott A.
    Ihde, Sherry M.
    Steckelberg, James M.
    Moriarty, James P.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Mandrekar, Jayawant N.
    Patel, Robin
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 61 (07) : 1071 - 1080
  • [4] Multiplex Identification of Gram-Positive Bacteria and Resistance Determinants Directly from Positive Blood Culture Broths: Evaluation of an Automated Microarray-Based Nucleic Acid Test
    Buchan, Blake W.
    Ginocchio, Christine C.
    Manii, Ryhana
    Cavagnolo, Robert
    Pancholi, Preeti
    Swyers, Lettie
    Thomson, Richard B., Jr.
    Anderson, Christopher
    Kaul, Karen
    Ledeboer, Nathan A.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2013, 10 (07)
  • [5] Butler-Wu S., 2020, GENOTYPIC FALSE DETE
  • [6] Chandrasekaran S, 2018, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V56, DOI [10.1128/JCM.01678-17, 10.1128/jcm.01678-17]
  • [7] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2022, PRINCIPALS PROCEDURE
  • [8] College of American Pathologists, 2021, MICR CHECKL
  • [9] Recent Advances in Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
    Datar, Rucha
    Orenga, Sylvain
    Pogorelcnik, Romain
    Rochas, Olivier
    Simner, Patricia J.
    van Belkum, Alex
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 68 (01) : 91 - 98
  • [10] Assessment of Rapid-Blood-Culture-Identification Result Interpretation and Antibiotic Prescribing Practices
    Donner, Linsey M.
    Campbell, W. Scott
    Lyden, Elizabeth
    Van Schooneveld, Trevor C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (05) : 1496 - 1507