Subjugation, freedom, and recognition in Poulain de la Barre and Simone de Beauvoir

被引:1
作者
Reuter, Martina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Social Sci & Philosophy, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
关键词
Poulain de la Barre; Simone de Beauvoir; subjugation; freedom; recognition;
D O I
10.1080/09608788.2022.2074364
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In 1949, Simone de Beauvoir cited the fairly unknown author Poulain de la Barre in an epigraph for The Second Sex (1949). When reading The Second Sex, one soon realizes that there are profound similarities between the two authors' discussions of women's situation. Both Poulain and Beauvoir view the subjection of women as a process that includes choice as well as force. Liberation necessarily requires overcoming opinions rooted in custom and prejudice. The article develops a comparison between the arguments of Poulain and Beauvoir in order to illuminate interesting features in the works of both authors. The focus is on similarities as well as differences. The first section examines how prejudice and the practices of men's self-interest have contributed to the reification of women. Section 2 discusses the peculiar nature of prejudices about oneself and section 3 focuses on the metaphysical relation between freedom and materiality. Finally, section 4 examines how mutual recognition becomes possible in the context of freedom, the search for truth, and friendship.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 318
页数:18
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Beauvoir Simone de., 1965, Prime of Life
[2]  
Beauvoir Simonede, 2004, PHILOS WRITINGS, V90149
[3]  
Beauvoir Simonede, 2004, PHILOS WRITINGS, V20320
[4]  
Beauvoir Simonede., 2011, 2 SEX
[5]  
Bergoffen Debra, 2004, PHILOS WRITINGS, P7987
[6]  
Broad J, 2017, ROUTL PHILOS COMPAN, P71
[7]  
de La Barre FrancoisPoulain., 2002, 3 CARTESIAN FEMINIST
[8]  
Descartes Ren, 1985, MEDITATIONS 1 PHILOS, V2
[9]  
Descartes Rene., 1985, The Philosophical Writings Of Descartes, P1
[10]   Patriarchal power as unjust: tyranny in seventeenth-century Venice [J].
Deslauriers, Marguerite .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, 2019, 27 (04) :718-737