Impact of Artificial Intelligence- Assisted Indication Selection on Appropriateness Order Scoring for Imaging Clinical Decision Support

被引:1
作者
Shreve, Lauren A. [1 ,9 ]
Fried, Jessica G. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Fang [5 ]
Cao, Quy [5 ]
Pakpoor, Jina [6 ]
Kahn Jr, Charles E. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Zafar, Hanna M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Abdominal Imaging, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Radiol Informat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Tumor Response Assessment Core, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] UCL, Ctr Med Imaging, London, England
[7] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Qual, Philadelphia, PA USA
[9] Hosp Univ Penn, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Imaging clinical decision support; informatics; artificial intelligence; implementation science;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2023.04.016
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess appropriateness scoring and structured order entry after the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool for analysis of free-text indications. Methods: Advanced outpatient imaging orders in a multicenter health care system were recorded 7 months before (March 1, 2020, to September 21, 2020) and after (October 20, 2020, to May 13, 2021) the implementation of an AI tool targeting free-text indications. Clinical decision support score (not appropriate, may be appropriate, appropriate, or unscored) and indication type (structured, free-text, both, or none) were assessed. The X-2 and multivariate logistic regression adjusting for covariables with bootstrapping were used.Results: In total, 115,079 orders before and 150,950 orders after AI tool deployment were analyzed. The mean patient age was 59.3 +/- 15.5 years, and 146,035 (54.9%) were women; 49.9% of orders were for CT, 38.8% for MR, 5.9% for nuclear medicine, and 5.4% for PET. After deployment, scored orders increased to 52% from 30% (P < .001). Orders with structured indications increased to 67.3% from 34.6% (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, orders were more likely to be scored after tool deployment (odds ratio [OR], 2.7, 95% CI, 2.63-2.78; P < .001). Compared with physicians, orders placed by nonphysician providers were less likely to be scored (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.83; P < .001). MR (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.87) and PET (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.10-0.13) were less likely to be scored than CT (; P < .001). After AI tool deployment, 72,083 orders (47.8%) remained unscored, 45,186 (62.7%) with free-text-only indications. Conclusions: Embedding AI assistance within imaging clinical decision support was associated with increased structured indication orders and independently predicted a higher likelihood of scored orders. However, 48% of orders remained unscored, driven by both provider behavior and infrastructure-related barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1258 / 1266
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PROT ACC MED ACT HR
  • [2] Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Decision Support for Radiologists and Referring Providers
    Bizzo, Bernardo C.
    Almeida, Renata R.
    Michalski, Mark H.
    Alkasab, Tarik K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (09) : 1351 - 1356
  • [3] Effectiveness of Clinical Decision Support in Controlling Inappropriate Imaging
    Blackmore, C. Craig
    Mecklenburg, Robert S.
    Kaplan, Gary S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 8 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [4] Effect of Clinical Decision-Support Systems A Systematic Review
    Bright, Tiffani J.
    Wong, Anthony
    Dhurjati, Ravi
    Bristow, Erin
    Bastian, Lori
    Coeytaux, Remy R.
    Samsa, Gregory
    Hasselblad, Vic
    Williams, John W.
    Musty, Michael D.
    Wing, Liz
    Kendrick, Amy S.
    Sanders, Gillian D.
    Lobach, David
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (01) : 29 - U77
  • [5] Clinical decision support for high-cost imaging: A randomized clinical trial
    Doyle, Joseph
    Abraham, Sarah
    Feeney, Laura
    Reimer, Sarah
    Finkelstein, Amy
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [6] Lessons From the Free-Text Epidemic: Opportunities to Optimize Deployment of Imaging Clinical Decision Support
    Fried, Jessica G.
    Pakpoor, Jina
    Kahn, Charles E., Jr.
    Zafar, Hanna M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 467 - 474
  • [7] Use of a Commercially Available Clinical Decision Support Tool to Expedite Prior Authorization in Partnership With a Private Payer
    Gaskin, Cree M.
    Ellenbogen, Amy L.
    Parkhurst, Kristi L.
    Matsumoto, Alan H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (06) : 857 - 863
  • [8] Retrospective Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Leveraging Free-Text Imaging Order Entry to Facilitate Federally Required Clinical Decision Support
    Gish, David S.
    Ellenbogen, Amy L.
    Patrie, James T.
    Gaskin, Cree M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (11) : 1476 - 1484
  • [9] Electronic Health Record-Based Interventions for Improving Appropriate Diagnostic Imaging A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Goldzweig, Caroline Lubick
    Orshansky, Greg
    Paige, Neil M.
    Miake-Lye, Isomi M.
    Beroes, Jessica M.
    Ewing, Brett A.
    Shekelle, Paul G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 162 (08) : 557 - +
  • [10] Automated evidence-based critiquing of orders for abdominal radiographs: Impact on utilization and appropriateness
    Harpole, LH
    Khorasani, R
    Fiskio, J
    Kuperman, GJ
    Bates, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1997, 4 (06) : 511 - 521