Comparison of the McGRATH™ Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:2
作者
Kim, Jong-Yeop [1 ]
Park, Seonghyeok [2 ]
Oh, Minho [2 ]
Choi, Jong-Bun [1 ]
John, Hyun-Ji [2 ]
Lee, Soo-Kyung [2 ]
Choi, Yi-Hwa [2 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Suwon 16499, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Sacred Heart Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Anyang 14068, South Korea
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2023年 / 59卷 / 02期
关键词
airway management; anesthesia; general; laryngoscopes; intubation; SERIES; 5; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; MANAGEMENT; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.3390/medicina59020282
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Difficult intubation, which may be encountered unexpectedly during anesthesia, can increase patients' morbidity and mortality. The McGRATH video laryngoscope is known to provide improved laryngeal visibility in patients with difficult or normal airways. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the McGRATH video laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation compared with that of conventional Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway scenarios. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were assigned to the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 50) or McGRATH video laryngoscope (n = 45) groups. In this study, to create a simulated difficult airway condition, the subjects performed manual in-line stabilization and applied a soft cervical collar. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation within 30 s. The time required for an intubation, glottis grade, intubation difficulty scale (IDS score), the subjective ease of intubation, and optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OLEM) were evaluated. In addition, complications caused by each blade were investigated. Results: The intubation success rate within 30 s was not significantly different between the two groups (44 (88.0%) vs. 36 (80.0%), p = 0.286). The glottic grade was better in the McGRATH group than in the Macintosh group (p = 0.029), but neither the intubation time (26.3 +/- 8.2 s vs. 24.2 +/- 5.0 s, p = 0.134) nor the rates of oral bleeding (2 (4.0%) vs. 0 (0.0%)) and tooth injury (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (2.2%)) were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The use of the McGRATH video laryngoscope did not improve the intubation success rate or shorten the intubation time. However, the McGRATH video laryngoscope provided a better glottis view than the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The intubation difficulty scale (IDS) - Proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation [J].
Adnet, F ;
Borron, SW ;
Racine, SX ;
Clemessy, JL ;
Fournier, JL ;
Plaisance, P ;
Lapandry, C .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (06) :1290-1297
[2]   2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway* [J].
Apfelbaum, Jeffrey L. ;
Hagberg, Carin A. ;
Connis, Richard T. ;
Abdelmalak, Basem B. ;
Agarkar, Madhulika ;
Dutton, Richard P. ;
Fiadjoe, John E. ;
Greif, Robert ;
Klock, P. Allan, Jr. ;
Mercier, David ;
Myatra, Sheila N. ;
O'Sullivan, Ellen P. ;
Rosenblatt, William H. ;
Sorbello, Massimiliano ;
Tung, Avery .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 136 (01) :31-81
[3]   Training method of applying pressure on the neck for laryngoscopy: use of a videolaryngoscope [J].
Asai, T ;
Murao, K ;
Shingu, K .
ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 58 (06) :602-603
[4]   Videolaryngoscopes Do They Truly Have Roles in Difficult Airways? [J].
Asai, Takashi .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 116 (03) :515-517
[5]   Two head positions for orotracheal intubation with the trachway videolight intubating stylet with manual in-line stabilization A randomized controlled trial [J].
Chan, Wei-Hung ;
Cheng, Chiao-Pei ;
Chiu, Yu-Lung ;
Hsu, Yung-Chi ;
Hu, Mei-Hua ;
Huang, Go-Shine .
MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (17) :E19645
[6]   Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: Anaesthesia [J].
Cook, T. M. ;
Woodall, N. ;
Frerk, C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (05) :617-631
[7]   A randomised cross-over trial comparing the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilisation [J].
Foulds, L. T. ;
McGuire, B. E. ;
Shippey, B. J. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (04) :437-442
[8]  
Gu YQ, 2016, CAN J ANESTH, V63, P928, DOI 10.1007/s12630-016-0654-6
[9]   McGrath videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis [J].
Hoshijima, Hiroshi ;
Mihara, Takahiro ;
Maruyama, Koichi ;
Denawa, Yohei ;
Takahashi, Masato ;
Shiga, Toshiya ;
Nagasaka, Hiroshi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2018, 46 :25-32
[10]   A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing tracheal intubation plus manual in-line stabilisation of the cervical spine using the Macintosh laryngoscope vs the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope [J].
Ilyas, S. ;
Symons, J. ;
Bradley, W. P. L. ;
Segal, R. ;
Taylor, H. ;
Lee, K. ;
Balkin, M. ;
Bain, C. ;
Ng, I. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 (12) :1345-1350