Evaluating the Facial Esthetic Outcomes of Digital Smile Designs Generated by Artificial Intelligence and Dental Professionals

被引:10
作者
Ceylan, Gulsum [1 ]
Ozel, Gulsum Sayin [1 ]
Memisoglu, Gozde [1 ]
Emir, Faruk [2 ]
Sen, Sevgin
机构
[1] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Hlth Sci Univ, Gulhane Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-06010 Ankara, Turkiye
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 15期
关键词
Artificial Intelligence (AI); dental esthetic; digital smile design (DSD); esthetic perception; PERCEPTION; DENTISTRY;
D O I
10.3390/app13159001
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the preference rates for smile designs created by professionals or by Artificial Intelligence (AI) among dentists, dentistry students, and laypeople. Four cases with symmetrical and asymmetrical features were selected based on the Facial Flow (FF) concept from the database of the Smile Designer app regarding anatomical facial points. Two smile designs were created for each selected case: one using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and one created manually. An online survey assessed participants' preferences for the different smile designs. The chi-square test "Pearson's and Fisher's exact test (P)" was used to analyze the survey data. A total of 628 people completed the study. Dentists preferred the manually-created smile design for the first three cases. For Case 4, dentists who used the Smile Designer program preferred the manually-created design (55.88%), while those who did not use the program preferred the AI-generated design (55.84%). There was a significant difference in esthetic perception between dentists and dental students (p = 0.001) and between dentists and laypeople (p = 0.001) for Case 1, only between dentists and dental students (p = 0.003) for Case 2, and only between dentists and laypeople (p = 0.001) for Case 3. Furthermore, we found that females (p = 0.007) and orthodontists (p = 0.025) had a higher preference for the AI-generated design in this case compared to males and other dental specialties for Case 3. While age, education level, and clinical experience did not significantly impact dentists' preference for manually-created or AI-generated smile designs (p > 0.05), our results suggest that there were some differences in preference for Case 3. Overall, our findings suggest that the use of AI-generated smile designs for symmetric faces is acceptable to both dentists and laypeople and can offer time-saving benefits for clinicians.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Ackerman Marc B, 2002, J Clin Orthod, V36, P221
[2]  
Arias David Montalvo, 2015, Dent Clin North Am, V59, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2015.03.007
[3]   Quantification of facial asymmetry by 2D analysis - A comparison of recent approaches [J].
Berlin, Nina Franka ;
Berssenbruegge, Philipp ;
Runte, Christoph ;
Wermker, Kai ;
Jung, Susanne ;
Kleinheinz, Johannes ;
Dirksen, Dieter .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (03) :265-271
[4]   Evolution of Aesthetic Dentistry [J].
Blatz, M. B. ;
Chiche, G. ;
Bahat, O. ;
Roblee, R. ;
Coachman, C. ;
Heymann, H. O. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 98 (12) :1294-1304
[5]   Artificial intelligence in dentistry: current applications and future perspectives [J].
Chen, Yo-Wei ;
Stanley, Kyle ;
Att, Wael .
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 51 (03) :248-257
[6]   Dynamic Documentation of the Smile and the 2D/3D Digital Smile Design Process [J].
Coachman, Christian ;
Calamita, Marcelo Alexandre ;
Sesma, Newton .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 37 (02) :183-+
[7]   DIGITALLY ENHANCED ESTHETIC DENTISTRY - FROM TREATMENT PLANNING TO QUALITY CONTROL [J].
Coachman, Christian ;
Paravina, Rade D. .
JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 28 :S3-S4
[8]   DSDapp use for multidisciplinary esthetic planning [J].
do Vale Voigt, Mateus ;
Espindola-Castro, Luis Felipe ;
de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz ;
Ortigoza, Leonardo Santiago ;
dos Santos Torreao, Adilson ;
Georg, Ralph .
JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 32 (08) :738-746
[9]  
Gansky S A, 2003, Adv Dent Res, V17, P109
[10]  
Iliev GV, 2020, INT J ESTHET DENT, V15, P92