Understanding Electability: The Effects of Implicit and Explicit Sexism on Candidate Perceptions

被引:4
|
作者
Britzman, Kylee [1 ,3 ]
Mehic-Parker, Joel [2 ]
机构
[1] Lewis Clark State Coll, Social Sci Program, Lewiston, ID USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Sch Polit Philosophy & Publ Affairs, Pullman, WA USA
[3] Lewis Clark State Coll, Social Sci Program, 500 8th Ave, Lewiston, ID 83501 USA
关键词
Electability; experiment; gender; implicit associations; race; voting behavior; GENDER STEREOTYPES; AMBIVALENT SEXISM; ATTITUDES; APPEARANCE; PREJUDICE; HOSTILE; WOMEN; SELF; LENS;
D O I
10.1080/1554477X.2023.2155773
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
During US electoral campaigns, arguments about "electability" are frequently leveled against candidates. For instance, voters may use strategic discrimination where they hesitate to support women candidates and candidates of color because they perceive others will discriminate against them, decreasing their electability. In this article, we seek to better understand the concept of perceived electability by assessing how voters' implicit and explicit attitudes about gender influence their candidate preferences. To do this, we conduct a survey experiment with a nationally representative sample (n = 745) from the United States that incorporates an original measure of implicit sexism.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 89
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Conditional Effects of Candidate Sex and Sexism on Perceived Electability and Voting Intentions: Evidence from the 2020 Democratic Primary
    Franks, Andrew S.
    ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 21 (01) : 11 - 28
  • [2] Ready for Hillary?: Explicit and Implicit Sexism in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Barnello, Michelle A.
    Bitecofer, Rachel
    Kidd, Quentin
    FORUM-A JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN CONTEMPORARY POLITICS, 2019, 17 (02): : 295 - 313
  • [4] Perceptions of Electability: Candidate (and Voter) Ideology, Race, and Gender
    Hassell, Hans J. G.
    Visalvanich, Neil
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2024, 46 (04) : 2075 - 2098
  • [5] Effects of sexism and job-applicant match on leadership candidate evaluations
    Fleming, Alissa C.
    Hlebasko, Hanna
    Adams, Sarah C.
    Roach, Krystal N.
    Christiansen, Neil D.
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2020, 48 (09):
  • [6] The Generalizability of Gender Bias: Testing the Effects of Contextual, Explicit, and Implicit Sexism on Labor Arbitration Decisions
    Girvan, Erik J.
    Deason, Grace
    Borgida, Eugene
    LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 39 (05) : 525 - 537
  • [7] Dangerous Motivations: Understanding How Marginalization Relates to Benevolent Sexism Through Threat Perceptions
    Davis, Tangier
    Troncoso, Solangel C.
    Jones, Martinque K.
    Robotham, Kathrina
    Settles, Isis H.
    SEX ROLES, 2024, 90 (05) : 600 - 612
  • [8] The Mirror and the Window: Making Implicit Perceptions of Leadership Explicit
    Greenhalgh, Anne M.
    Maxwell, Christopher, I
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2019, 43 (06) : 598 - 629
  • [9] Split Feelings: Understanding Implicit and Explicit Political Persuasion
    Ryan, Timothy J.
    Krupnikov, Yanna
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 115 (04) : 1424 - 1441
  • [10] The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters
    Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2015, 37 (02) : 357 - 395