Assessing the progress and spatial patterns of sustainable eco-environmental development based on the 2030 Agenda for SDGs in China

被引:3
|
作者
Wei, Dongsheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wanting [1 ]
Yang, Wentao [3 ]
Chen, Hao [4 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ Forestry & Technol, Coll Civil Engn, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Nat Resources Affairs Ctr, Hunan Key Lab Remote Sensing Monitoring Ecol Envir, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Natl local Joint Engn Lab Geospatial Informat Tech, 1 Taoyuan Rd, Xiangtan, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Local Sustainable Dev Goals, Xiangtan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Eco-environment; sustainable development; 2030; agenda; spatial statistics; spatial patterns; POLLUTION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2022.2155265
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The eco-environment is fundamental for human survival and development. To gain insight into Chinese eco-environmental challenges, a scientific and quantifying assessment of sustainable eco-environmental development (SED) is essential and can guide policy development and implementation. However, systematic methods for assessing progress towards achieving SED are lacking based on the 2030 Agenda for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Therefore, we developed a systematic method to quantify SED progress at the provincial level in China. In the proposed method, the SED indicator framework was developed to align with the global indicator framework (GIF), adopting clear statistical definitions for each indicator and the criteria of data selection at provincial levels in China. A four-level method of identifying the upper and lower bounds of the indicator values was proposed to normalise them to a standard scale of 0-100. The SED index and three composite indices were aggregated by the arithmetic means of the individual scores for assessing overall SED progress. A spatial autocorrelation analysis was used to explore the spatial patterns of the SED index scores. The results showed that all provinces except Shandong and Hebei had relatively good performances in achieving SED. Most provinces performed better in terms of the water area eco-environment than they do in terms of the air and terrestrial eco-environments. In addition, some provinces showed a positive spatial autocorrelation pattern on the SED index scores, and the high-value (low-value) aggregation regions were mainly concentrated in Western (East) China. These results provide a richer understanding of the challenges for SED faced by each province in China.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 401
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] One Step Away from 2030: An Assessment of the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the European Union ( jun , 10.1057/s41287-024-00641-0 , 2024)
    Barbera-Marine, Maria-Gloria
    Fabregat-Aibar, Laura
    Ferreira, Valeria
    Terceno, Antonio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2024, 36 (06) : 1636 - 1638
  • [42] Different effects of technological progress on China's carbon emissions based on sustainable development
    Chen, Jiandong
    Gao, Ming
    Ma, Ke
    Song, Malin
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (02) : 481 - 492
  • [43] China?s improving total environmental quality and environment-economy coordination since 2000: Progress towards sustainable development goals
    Fang, Chuanglin
    Fan, Yupeng
    Bao, Chao
    Li, Guangdong
    Wang, Zhenbo
    Sun, Siao
    Ma, Haitao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 387
  • [44] Assessing the role of financial development and financial inclusion to enhance environmental sustainability: Do financial inclusion and eco-innovation promote sustainable development?
    Wang, Yaping
    Fahad, Shah
    Wei, Liqian
    Luo, Bowen
    Luo, Jianchao
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [45] NEW AVENUE FOR URBAN CONSERVATION IN CHINA UNDER NEW AGENDA OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
    Han, Jie
    Wang, Liangliang
    Heng, Chye Kiang
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2021, 30 (04): : 3924 - 3934
  • [46] Analyses of driving factors on the spatial variations in regional eco-environmental quality using two types of species distribution models: A case study of Minjiang River Basin, China
    Li, Yudong
    Li, Zhijian
    Wang, Junjian
    Zeng, Hui
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 139
  • [47] Use of Entropy in Developing SDG-based Indices for Assessing Regional Sustainable Development: A Provincial Case Study of China
    Wang, Xiangyu
    Gao, Peichao
    Song, Changqing
    Cheng, Changxiu
    ENTROPY, 2020, 22 (04)
  • [48] Green innovations for sustainable development of China: Analysis based on the nested spatial panel models
    Huang, Hongyun
    Wang, Fengrong
    Song, Malin
    Balezentis, Tomas
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2021, 65
  • [49] Regional spatial patterns and influencing factors of environmental auditing for sustainable development: summaries and illuminations from international experiences
    Haiyan Lu
    Yanqiang Wei
    Suchang Yang
    Yunwei Liu
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 3577 - 3597
  • [50] Regional spatial patterns and influencing factors of environmental auditing for sustainable development: summaries and illuminations from international experiences
    Lu, Haiyan
    Wei, Yanqiang
    Yang, Suchang
    Liu, Yunwei
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (04) : 3577 - 3597