Comparative analysis of cone-beam breast computed tomography and digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer diagnosis: A comprehensive study on reconstruction algorithms

被引:1
|
作者
Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel [1 ,8 ]
Tian, Yuchi [2 ]
Awoniya, Olanrewaju James [3 ]
Chen, Shuang-Qing [4 ,5 ]
Yang, Xiaodong [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Collaborat Res Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Acad Engn & Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Open Univ Nigeria, Dept Informat Technol, Abuja, Nigeria
[4] Nanjing Med Univ, Gusu Sch, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Suzhou Hosp, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Med Imaging, Suzhou Inst Biomed Engn & Technol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Jihua Lab, Foshan 528000, Peoples R China
[8] Shanghai Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Collaborat Res Ctr, Shanghai 201318, Peoples R China
关键词
breast cancer; cone-beam breast computed tomography; digital breast tomosynthesis; image quality assessment; reconstruction algorithm; IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; CT; PERFORMANCE; STATISTICS; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN; MLEM;
D O I
10.1002/ima.23071
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed non-skin cancer in women. To achieve early and accurate diagnosis, three-dimensional (3D) cone-beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) modalities are used. Importantly, the comparison of reconstruction accuracy of both CBBCT and DBT has rarely been investigated, thus constituting a research gap. This study systematically investigated the performances of the CBBCT and DBT for different reconstruction algorithms using both BR3D breast phantom and breast images. We acquired clinical breast images and scanned the BR3D phantom for additional breast images. These acquired images were used to simulate projection data using predefined CBBCT and DBT geometries. The simulated projections were reconstructed using five different reconstruction algorithms. To evaluate the reconstruction accuracy, we calculated average image quality assessment (IQA) indices, including peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), root mean square error (RMSE), and others, across different algorithms and modalities. The pooled PSNR, SSIM, and RMSE for DBT and CBBCT images are (31.6265 +/- 0.8725), (0.9353 +/- 0.0077), and (0.0270 +/- 0.0025) and (29.7007 +/- 0.9249), (0.9136 +/- 0.0130), and (0.0342 +/- 0.0040), which implies that the overall IQA indices of DBT are superior to CBBCT; therefore, DBT tends to reveal more BC detectability as the diagnosis outcome would largely depend on good quality images. The results show that DBT gives an improved result for all algorithms compared to CBBCT, although further experimental trials may be needed to establish the findings fully. The findings suggest that using DBT may enhance the accuracy of BC diagnosis compared to CBBCT due to its superior image quality in clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of selecting optimal reconstruction algorithms for improved diagnostic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for microcalcifications and margins to microcalcifications in breast specimens
    Neubauer, Claudia
    Yilmaz, Jannina Samantha
    Bronsert, Peter
    Pichotka, Martin
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Windfuhr-Blum, Marisa
    Erbes, Thalia
    Neubauer, Jakob
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [2] Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for microcalcifications and margins to microcalcifications in breast specimens
    Claudia Neubauer
    Jannina Samantha Yilmaz
    Peter Bronsert
    Martin Pichotka
    Fabian Bamberg
    Marisa Windfuhr-Blum
    Thalia Erbes
    Jakob Neubauer
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [3] THE VALUE OF CONE-BEAM BREAST COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN BREAST CANCER DETECTION AND DIAGNOSIS WITH COMPARISON TO CONVENTIONAL DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY
    Ye, Zhaoxiang
    Yin, Lu
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 : 120 - 120
  • [4] Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Approach
    Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel
    Zhang, Cheng
    Olagbaju, Oluwatosin Atinuke
    Yuan, Gang
    Du, Qiang
    Li, Ming
    Zheng, Jian
    Yang, Xiaodong
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (09)
  • [5] A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis
    Zhang, Yiheng
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Wei, Jun
    Goodsitt, Mitchell M.
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Ge, Jun
    Zhou, Chuan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (10) : 3781 - 3795
  • [6] Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography
    O'Connell, Avice M.
    Karellas, Andrew
    Vedantham, Srinivasan
    Kawakyu-O'Connor, Daniel T.
    SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2018, 39 (01) : 106 - 113
  • [7] Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Breast Biopsy Analysis: Simulations
    Laamanen, C.
    LeClair, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4641 - 4641
  • [8] Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography and head-to-head comparison of digital mammography, magnetic resonance imaging and cone-beam breast computed tomography for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gong, Wenye
    Zhu, Jingjin
    Hong, Chenyan
    Liu, Xiaohan
    Li, Shuaiqi
    Chen, Yizhu
    Zhang, Boya
    Li, Xiru
    GLAND SURGERY, 2023, 12 (10) : 1360 - 1374
  • [9] Cone-beam micro computed tomography dedicated to the breast
    Sarno, Antonio
    Mettivier, Giovanni
    Di Lillo, Francesca
    Cesarelli, Mario
    Bifulco, Paolo
    Russo, Paolo
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2016, 38 (12) : 1449 - 1457
  • [10] AlignRT in breast cancer, towards the end of cone-beam computed tomography ?
    Carlet, Frederic
    Vial, Nicolas
    Goyet, Dominique
    Develtere, Nicolas
    Bonhomme, Blandine
    Bonhomme, Bertrand
    Jadaud, Eric
    Saint-Gaudens, Anne Bareille
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S535 - S537