Incorporating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Content Into Bioengineering Curricula: A Program-Level Approach

被引:0
作者
Mollica, Molly Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Olszewski, Emily [2 ]
Kiyohara, Casey L. [2 ]
Matusalem, Danafe D. [2 ]
Ochs, Alexander R. [2 ]
Imoukhuede, Princess I. [2 ]
Regnier, Michael [2 ]
Yasuhara, Ken [5 ]
Thomas, Wendy E. [2 ]
Taylor, Alyssa C. [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Dept Mech Engn, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Bioengn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Div Hematol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Bloodworks Res Inst, Seattle, WA 98102 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Off Advancement Engn Teaching & Learning, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Diego, Shu Chien Gene Lay Dept Bioengn, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2024年 / 146卷 / 05期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1115/1.4063819
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are interconnected with bioengineering, yet have historically been absent from accreditation standards and curricula. Toward educating DEI-competent bioengineers and meeting evolving accreditation requirements, we took a program-level approach to incorporate, catalog, and assess DEI content through the bioengineering undergraduate program. To support instructors in adding DEI content and inclusive pedagogy, our team developed a DEI planning worksheet and surveyed instructors pre- and post-course. Over the academic year, 74% of instructors provided a pre-term and/or post-term response. Of responding instructors, 91% described at least one DEI curricular content improvement, and 88% incorporated at least one new inclusive pedagogical approach. Based on the curricular adjustments reported by instructors, we grouped the bioengineering-related DEI content into five DEI competency categories: bioethics, inclusive design, inclusive scholarship, inclusive professionalism, and systemic inequality. To assess the DEI content incorporation, we employed direct assessment via course assignments, end-of-module student surveys, end-of-term course evaluations, and an end-of-year program review. When asked how much their experience in the program helped them develop specific DEI competencies, students reported a relatively high average of 3.79 (scale of 1 = "not at all" to 5 = "very much"). Additionally, based on student performance in course assignments and other student feedback, we found that instructors were able to effectively incorporate DEI content into a wide variety of courses. We offer this framework and lessons learned to be adopted by programs similarly motivated to train DEI-competent engineering professionals and provide an equitable, inclusive engineering education for all students.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] ABET, 2023, CRITERIA ACCREDITING
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology, 2021
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023
  • [4] Asgarpoor J. S., 2021, 2021 ASEE VIRTUAL AN
  • [5] Bansal S., 2023, BIOMED ENG ED, V3, P331, DOI [10.1007/s43683-023-00116-4, DOI 10.1007/S43683-023-00116-4]
  • [6] Blackmon R., 2022, 2022 COLLABORATIVE N
  • [7] CAMACHO MM, 2011, FIE, DOI DOI 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142970
  • [8] Racial Biology and Medical Misconceptions
    Deyrup, Andrea
    Graves, Joseph L., Jr.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 386 (06) : 501 - 503
  • [9] Diaz J., 2023, FLORIDA GOV RON DESA
  • [10] Dobbin F, 2016, HARVARD BUS REV, V94, P52