Patient radiation doses from adult CT examinations at the Souss Massa Regional Hospital

被引:5
作者
EL Fahssi, M. [1 ]
Semghouli, S. [2 ]
Amaoui, B. [3 ]
Jroundi, L. [1 ]
Caoui, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed V Univ, Fac Med & Pharm, Rabat, Morocco
[2] Higher Inst Nursing Profess & Hlth Tech ISPITS, Res Lab Hlth & Environm Sci LabReSSE, Team Hlth Tech ETechS, Agadir, Morocco
[3] Ibn Zohr Univ, Fac Med & Pharm, Agadir, Morocco
关键词
Computed tomography; CTDIvol; DLP; effective dose; ESTABLISHMENT;
D O I
10.1051/radiopro/2023030
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess patient radiation doses, and to establish diagnostic reference levels for Adult CT examinations at the Souss Massa Regional Hospital, Morocco.Method: Data from 6 CT examinations were collected between January and June 2023 at the Souss Massa Regional Hospital, including patient age, sex, weight, and height, as well as scanner acquisition parameters such as the number of series, use of contrast media, rotation time plus slice thickness, the displayed Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDIvol), and the Dose Length Product (DLP). Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) were calculated for each type of CT examination by estimating the 75% percentile of CTDIvol and DLP. The effective dose is calculated using the following formula: E(mSv) = EDLP x DLP (mGy.cm). The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 software.Results: DRLs in terms of CTDIvol, and DLP for the brain without contrast media are 64,45 mGy, and 1405,77 mGy.cm respectively. For chest CT without contrast media, they are 11,13 mGy, and 417,73 mGy.cm respectively. The data from the abdominal CT show that the CTDIvol (9,74 mGy) and DLP (529,31 mGy.cm) values with contrast media are higher than those without contrast media, which are (9,35 mGy) and (515,21 mGy.cm) respectively. DRls in terms of CTDIvol and DLP for abdomen and pelvis (AP) CT with contrast media are 8,14 mGy and 444,51 mGy.cm respectively. For chest abdomen and pelvis (CAP) with contrast media they are 8,51 mGy, and 571,30 mGy.cm respectively. The effective doses were 2,37, 6,50, 6,24, 6,76, 5,07, 7,13 mSv for the brain without contrast media, chest without contrast media, abdomen without contrast media, abdomen with contrast media, AP with contrast media, and CAP respectively.Conclusion: Adapting CT protocols according to the morphology of patients and the conditions under which each examination is performed can help maintain the doses received by patients at an optimum level.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 18
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abdulhamid M., 2022, Nigeria. Appl Radiat Isot 190, P350
[2]  
AIEA, 2018, IAEA safety standards series No. GSG-8 VIENNA, P6
[3]  
Albahiti SK., 2022, Radiat Phys Chm 2012, V110477, P1
[4]  
Amaoui B., 2019, Morocco. Indian J Public Health Res Dev, V10, P629
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Investig Radiol
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, V103, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ICRP.2007.10.003
[7]   Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for a Singapore healthcare cluster [J].
Arlany, L. ;
Toh, H. G. ;
Nazir, B. ;
Ng, J. J. ;
Tay, Y. H. ;
Tay, Y. S. ;
Poon, C. J. X. ;
Lee, L. N. ;
Fum, W. K. S. ;
Lee, E. Y. T. ;
Mariah, S., I ;
Fortier, M., V ;
Tham, W. P. ;
Chew, L. L. ;
Chong, K. H. E. ;
Chong, L. R. .
RADIOGRAPHY, 2023, 29 (01) :184-189
[8]   Patient dose assessment in computed tomography in a Moroccan imaging department [J].
Benamar, M. ;
Housni, A. ;
Sadiki, S. ;
Amazian, K. ;
Essahlaoui, A. ;
Labzour, A. .
RADIOPROTECTION, 2023, 58 (01) :49-53
[9]  
Buzug TM, 2008, Computed tomography: From photon statistics to modern cone-beam CT, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-39408-2
[10]   The Relationship of Body Mass Index and Abdominal Fat on the Radiation Dose Received During Routine Computed Tomographic Imaging of the Abdomen and Pelvis [J].
Chan, Victoria O. ;
McDermott, Shaunagh ;
Buckley, Orla ;
Allen, Sonya ;
Casey, Michael ;
O'Laoide, Risteard ;
Torreggiani, William C. .
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2012, 63 (04) :260-266