Fairness of AI in Predicting the Risk of Recidivism: Review and Phase Mapping of AI Fairness Techniques

被引:3
|
作者
Farayola, Michael Mayowa [1 ]
Tal, Irina [1 ]
Saber, Takfarinas [2 ]
Connolly, Regina [3 ]
Bendechache, Malika [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, Lero Res Ctr, Sch Comp, Dublin 9, Ireland
[2] Univ Galway, Sch Comp Sci, Lero Reseach Ctr, Galway, Ireland
[3] Dublin City Univ, Lero Res Ctr, Sch Business, Dublin 9, Ireland
[4] Univ Galway, Sch Comp Sci, Lero Res Ctr, Galway, Ireland
[5] Univ Galway, Sch Comp Sci, ADAPT Res Ctr, Galway, Ireland
来源
18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AVAILABILITY, RELIABILITY & SECURITY, ARES 2023 | 2023年
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence; Criminal Justice System; Fair-ness; Trust; Recidivism; MODELS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1145/3600160.3605033
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is applied in almost every public sector because of its positive impacts. However, AI's ethical aspects and trustworthiness constitute a significant uproar and concern among different AI stakeholders due to AI's adverse effect on users when the AI system lacks cautionary measures. AI is used in the criminal justice system for predicting recidivism risk. However, AI's nega-tive impact translates into bias and high incarceration towards a group of defendants in a population assessed for recidivism risk. This paper focuses on fairness as a requirement of a trustworthy AI framework previously proposed to ascertain the appropriate application of AI systems in predicting recidivism. This paper aims to raise awareness about the fairness of AI models and stimulate fur-ther research and deployment of effcient and effective exploitation of fair and trustworthy AI models in the criminal justice system when predicting recidivism. Fairness has been a significant concern for criminal justice system stakeholders and has received consid-erable attention with more theoretical and practical studies than other trustworthy AI requirements. Hence, this paper reviews state-of-the-art fairness, outlines valuable findings, and proposes future directions to achieve fair AI systems for predicting recidivism risk. In addition, this paper ensures mapping existing technical works in the literature to the fairness pipeline corresponding to the criminal justice system's AI development phases.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implications of AI (Un-)Fairness in Higher Education Admissions The Effects of Perceived AI (Un-)Fairness on Exit, Voice and Organizational Reputation
    Marcinkowski, Frank
    Kieslich, Kimon
    Starke, Christopher
    Lunich, Marco
    FAT* '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, 2020, : 122 - 130
  • [42] AI: Friend or foe of fairness perceptions of the tax administration? A survey experiment on citizens' procedural fairness perceptions
    Decuypere, Anouk
    van de Vijver, Anne
    GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2025, 42 (01)
  • [43] Auditing the AI Auditors: A Framework for Evaluating Fairness and Bias in High Stakes AI Predictive Models
    Landers, Richard N.
    Behrend, Tara S.
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2023, 78 (01) : 36 - 49
  • [44] Impression transference from AI to human: The impact of AI's fairness on interpersonal perception in AI-Mediated communication
    Li, Jiahao
    Chu, Yang
    Xu, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2023, 179
  • [45] Social Media Use and Attitudes toward AI: The Mediating Roles of Perceived AI Fairness and Threat
    Li, Wenbo
    Zheng, Xia
    HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 2024
  • [46] A roadmap to artificial intelligence (AI): Methods for designing and building AI ready data to promote fairness
    Kidwai-Khan, Farah
    Wang, Rixin
    Skanderson, Melissa
    Brandt, Cynthia A.
    Fodeh, Samah
    Womack, Julie A.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 154
  • [47] Using edge cases to disentangle fairness and solidarity in AI ethics
    James Brusseau
    AI and Ethics, 2022, 2 (3): : 441 - 447
  • [48] When fairness is an abstraction: equity and AI in Swedish compulsory education
    Moden, Marie Utterberg
    Ponti, Marisa
    Lundin, Johan
    Tallvid, Martin
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [49] Fairness in AI: challenges in bridging the gap between algorithms and law
    Giannopoulos, Giorgos
    Psalla, Maria
    Kavouras, Loukas
    Sacharidis, Dimitris
    Marecek, Jakub
    Matilla, German M.
    Emiris, Ioannis
    2024 IEEE 40TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING WORKSHOP, ICDEW, 2024, : 217 - 225
  • [50] From Reality to World. A Critical Perspective on AI Fairness
    Jean-Marie John-Mathews
    Dominique Cardon
    Christine Balagué
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2022, 178 : 945 - 959