共 50 条
Determination of optimal tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters using electrocardiography: a retrospective study
被引:2
作者:
Jung, Ki Tae
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Kelly, Linda
[5
]
Kuznetsov, Alexandra
[1
]
Sabouri, A. Sassan
[2
,6
]
Lee, Kichang
[1
,2
,7
]
机构:
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, 185 Cambridge St,3-224, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[3] Chosun Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Gwangju, South Korea
[4] Chosun Univ, Med Sch, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Gwangju, South Korea
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Nursing Serv, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cardiac Arrhythmia Serv, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词:
Anatomy;
Central venous catheterization;
Electrocardiography;
PICC line placement;
Vertebral body;
X-rays;
CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS;
CAVOATRIAL JUNCTION;
PLACEMENT;
LANDMARK;
CARINA;
ACCESS;
D O I:
10.4097/kja.22639
中图分类号:
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号:
100217 ;
摘要:
Background: Accurate tip positioning of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is crucial for optimal drug delivery and avoiding complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the amplitude ratios of intravascular electrocardiography (ivECG) and ex-ternal electrocardiography (exECG) according to the tip location.Methods: This retrospective study analyzed ivECG, exECG, and chest X-ray (CXR) of 278 patients who underwent a PICC procedure. The tip-to-carina distance (TCD) was mea-sured using vertebral body units (VBU) on CXR. Tip locations were categorized as follows: Zone 1, malposition (TCD < 0.8 VBU); Zone 2, suboptimal (0.8 VBU <= TCD < 1.5 VBU); Zone 3, optimal (1.5 VBU <= TCD <= 2.4 VBU); Zone 4, deep (TCD > 2.4 VBU). The am-plitude ratios between ivECG and exECG and within ivECG were compared in each zone.Results: The ivECG/exECG amplitude ratios of P-wave (Piv/Pex) and QRS-complex (QRiv/ QRex and RSiv/RSex) in Zone 3 were significantly higher than in Zones 1 and 2 (adjusted P < 0.05). The ivECG amplitude ratios of the P-wave and QRS-complex (Piv/QRiv and Piv/ RSiv) were significantly lower in Zone 3 than in Zones 1 and 2 (adjusted P < 0.001). The calculated TCD using stepwise multiple regression analysis was estimated to be 1.121 + 0.078 x Piv/Pex - 0.172 x Piv/QRiv.Conclusions: Though caution is required, amplitude ratios such as Piv/Pex and Piv/QRiv can help determine tip location during the PICC catheterization procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 251
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条