Polyp characteristics at screening colonoscopy and post- colonoscopy colorectal cancer mortality: a retrospective cohort study

被引:6
|
作者
Zessner-Spitzenberg, Jasmin [1 ,3 ]
Jiricka, Lena [2 ]
Waldmann, Elisabeth [1 ,3 ]
Rockenbauer, Lisa -Maria [1 ,3 ]
Cook, Jeremy [1 ,3 ]
Hinterberger, Anna [1 ,3 ]
Majcher, Barbara [1 ,3 ]
Szymanska, Aleksandra [3 ]
Asaturi, Arno [3 ]
Trauner, Michael [1 ]
Ferlitsch, Monika [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Internal Med 3, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Waehringer Guertel 18-20,7i, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Stat Informat & Intelligent Syst, Inst Clin Biometr, Vienna, Austria
[3] Austrian Soc Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Qual Assurance Working Grp, Vienna, Austria
关键词
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; SIZE; SURVEILLANCE; INDIVIDUALS; POLYPECTOMY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.021
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Polyp size and high-grade dysplasia in polyps at screening colonoscopy are considered risk factors for post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) development and death, which might be averted by surveillance colonoscopy. However, robust evidence backing these risk factors is lacking. We aimed to investigate whether polyp size or dysplasia grade is associated with PCCRC mortality. Methods: This was a retrospective study including individuals of the Austrian Quality Certificate for Screening Colonoscopy who underwent a colonoscopy between January 2007 and December 2020. We investigated the association of polyp size and dysplasia in polyps with PCCRC mortality according to Cox regression analysis. In addition, whether patients with certain polyp characteristics had similar risk for CRC death compared with the Austrian population was assessed by calculating standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). Results: A total of 316,001 individuals were included. After a median follow-up time of 5.27 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.25-5.29), a significant association of polyps 10 to 20 mm (hazard ratio, 4.00; 95% CI, 2.46-6.50; P < .001) as well as high-grade dysplasia (hazard ratio, 6.61; 95% CI, 3.31-13.2; P < .001) with PCCRC death was observed. PCCRC mortality was significantly lower than the expected CRC mortality in the general population in patients with polyps <10 mm and without high-grade dysplasia (SMR, .27; 95% CI, .21-.33; P < .001), which was not observed for patients with polyps >10 mm or with high-grade dysplasia (SMR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.64-2.57; P < .001). Conclusions: Polyp size >10 mm and high-grade dysplasia are associated with PCCRC mortality in screening patients. The data suggest that these patients might benefit most from surveillance colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy for reduction of colorectal cancer mortality
    Ko, Cynthia W.
    Doria-Rose, V. Paul
    Barrett, Michael J.
    Kamineni, Aruna
    Enewold, Lindsey
    Weiss, Noel S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (07) : 1273 - 1281
  • [22] Participation in colorectal cancer screening with FOBT and colonoscopy: An Italian, multicentre, randomized population study
    Lisi, Daniele
    Hassan, C. Cesare
    Crespi, Massimo
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2010, 42 (05) : 371 - 376
  • [23] Polyp detection rate and cumulative incidence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Germany
    Schwarz, Sarina
    Hornschuch, Michel
    Pox, Christian
    Haug, Ulrike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 152 (08) : 1547 - 1555
  • [24] Uptake of Colon Capsule Endoscopy vs Colonoscopy for Screening Relatives of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Adrian-de-Ganzo, Zaida
    Alarcon-Fernandez, Onofre
    Ramos, Laura
    Gimeno-Garcia, Antonio
    Alonso-Abreu, Inmaculada
    Carrillo, Marta
    Quintero, Enrique
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 13 (13) : 2293 - +
  • [25] Screening Colonoscopy Findings Are Associated With Noncolorectal Cancer Mortality
    Sullivan, Brian A.
    Qin, Xuejun
    Miller, Cameron
    Hauser, Elizabeth R.
    Redding, Thomas S.
    Gellad, Ziad F.
    Madison, Ashton N.
    Musselwhite, Laura W.
    Efird, Jimmy T.
    Sims, Kellie J.
    Williams, Christina D.
    Weiss, David
    Lieberman, David
    Provenzale, Dawn
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 13 (04) : E00479
  • [26] Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Cross, Amanda J.
    Robbins, Emma C.
    Pack, Kevin
    Stenson, Iain
    Kirby, Paula L.
    Patel, Bhavita
    Rutter, Matthew
    Veitch, Andrew M.
    Saunders, Brian P.
    Little, Matthew
    Gray, Alastair
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Wooldrage, Kate
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2022, 26 (26) : I - +
  • [27] Association Between Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in a US Cohort According to Site of Cancer and Colonoscopist Specialty
    Baxter, Nancy N.
    Warren, Joan L.
    Barrett, Michael J.
    Stukel, Therese A.
    Doria-Rose, V. Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (21) : 2664 - 2669
  • [28] Surveillance Colonoscopy in Elderly Patients A Retrospective Cohort Study
    An Hong Tran
    Ngor, Eunis Wai Man
    Wu, Bechien U.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (10) : 1675 - 1682
  • [29] Providers Role in Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer
    Ramdass, Prakash
    Petraro, Paul
    Via, Christina
    Shahrokni, Armin
    Nawaz, Haq
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2014, 38 (02): : 234 - 244
  • [30] The NordICC Study: Rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
    Kaminski, M. F.
    Bretthauer, M.
    Zauber, A. G.
    Kuipers, E. J.
    Adami, H. -O.
    van Ballegooijen, M.
    Regula, J.
    van Leerdam, M.
    Stefansson, T.
    Paehlman, L.
    Dekker, E.
    Hernan, M. A.
    Garborg, K.
    Hoff, G.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 44 (07) : 695 - 702