An Innovative Construction Site Safety Assessment Solution Based on the Integration of Bayesian Network and Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:3
作者
Xiao, Lizhao [1 ]
Tang, Llewellyn C. M. [1 ]
Wen, Ya [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Architecture, Dept Real Estate & Construct, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
关键词
Bayesian Network; AHP; construction safety assessment; risk assessment; quantitative risk analysis; QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS; PROCESS AHP; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; RELIABILITY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3390/buildings13122918
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The building construction industry in mainland China is distinguished by one of the highest accident rates and numbers of fatalities. Therefore, risk assessment plays a significant role in preventing safety incidents and economic losses. However, traditional risk assessment methods are mainly experience-based which could introduce significant uncertainties in accident chain estimation, quantitative analysis, and handling with uncertainty. Safety accidents are difficult to estimate, which might lead to inappropriate safety-related decision making. To solve this problem, an innovative quantitative analysis strategy has been developed, generating a loss index for various accidents in the construction site, based on the Bayesian Network and Analytic Hierarchy Process solution. In this solution, the contribution rate of every risk factor to a certain accident can be calculated. Based on those, the loss index of each construction site can be calculated by inputting current risk factors in the construction site. Moreover, the real-time loss index can be estimated which can help the management team with more accurate decision making compared with the traditional approaches. With this model, the safety situation on the construction site can be clarified and the risk priority can be analyzed according to the dynamic condition.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects [J].
Aminbakhsh, Saman ;
Gunduz, Murat ;
Sonmez, Rifat .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2013, 46 :99-105
[2]   How useful is quantitative risk assessment? [J].
Apostolakis, GE .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2004, 24 (03) :515-520
[3]   Reliability and validity of risk analysis [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Heide, Bjornar .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (11) :1862-1868
[4]   Using AHP for determining priority in a safety management system [J].
Chan, AHS ;
Kwok, W ;
Duffy, VG .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2004, 104 (5-6) :430-445
[5]   Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management [J].
Dagdeviren, Metin ;
Yueksel, Ihsan .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2008, 178 (06) :1717-1733
[6]   A comprehensive framework for assessing and selecting appropriate scaffolding based on analytic hierarchy process [J].
Fang, DP ;
Shen, QP ;
Wu, SH ;
Liu, GW .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2003, 34 (05) :589-596
[7]   Bayesian Survival Analysis Model for Girth Weld Failure Prediction [J].
Feng, Qingshan ;
Sha, Shengyi ;
Dai, Lianshuang .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (06)
[8]  
Franke A., 1987, INT J PROJ MANAG, V5, P29, DOI DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(87)90007-X
[9]   Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models [J].
Fu, Gui ;
Cao, Jia-Lin ;
Zhou, Lin ;
Xiang, Yuan-Chi .
PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2017, 14 (03) :570-578
[10]   Towards a better reliability of risk assessment: Development of a qualitative & quantitative risk evaluation model (Q2REM) for different trades of construction works in Hong Kong [J].
Fung, Ivan W. H. ;
Lo, Tommy Y. ;
Tung, Karen C. F. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2012, 48 :167-184