Environmental information disclosure and firm production: evidence from the estimated efficiency of publicly listed firms in China

被引:5
作者
Lu, Yunguo [1 ]
Zhang, Lin [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental information disclosure; Efficiency; Nonparametric location-scale regression; Government subsidy; Porter hypothesis; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; BANDWIDTH SELECTION; CORPORATE BOARDS; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; MODELS; REGULATIONS; COMPETITION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11123-022-00655-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study employs the recently developed conditional nonparametric frontier approach to assess the impact of environmental expenditures associated with environmental information disclosure (EID) on the production of China's listed manufacturing firms from 2010 to 2018. An inverted U-shaped relationship is found between environmental expenditures and firms' productive efficiency. Increasing expenditure on pollution control initially lowers the production efficiency at firm level, and indicates the negative impacts of regulatory costs attributable to the resources devoted to EID-related activities. However, a firm's production efficiency increases with environmental expenditure after a certain threshold, which implies that the regulatory costs can be fully offset by triggering innovation. The co-existence of the traditional view of the negative impacts of environmental regulation on production and the positive impacts of Porter-type innovation explains the mixed empirical evidence in the literature. Government subsidies help firms to cover the regulatory costs and support a smooth transition to a Porter-type innovation regime. We also find that continuous environmental investments beyond the threshold can narrow the efficiency gap between firms in the same industry, bringing about additional societal spillover impacts. Our findings thus deepen the understanding on how regulations such as EID affect the economic performance of public firms.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 119
页数:21
相关论文
共 70 条
[61]  
Racine, 2007, Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice
[62]   Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors [J].
Rubashkina, Yana ;
Galeotti, Marzio ;
Verdolini, Elena .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 83 :288-300
[63]   Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes [J].
Simar, Leopold ;
Wilson, Paul W. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 136 (01) :31-64
[64]   Hypothesis testing in nonparametric models of production using multiple sample splits [J].
Simar, Leopold ;
Wilson, Paul W. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2020, 53 (03) :287-303
[65]   Stochastic FDH/DEA estimators for frontier analysis [J].
Simar, Leopold ;
Zelenyuk, Valentin .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2011, 36 (01) :1-20
[66]   What is the economic meaning of FDH? [J].
Thrall, RM .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 1999, 11 (03) :243-250
[68]  
Tulkens H., 2006, PUBLIC GOODS ENV EXT, P311, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-25534-7_17.
[69]   Does environmental information disclosure contribute to improve firm financial performance? An examination of the underlying mechanism [J].
Wang, Shanyong ;
Wang, Hualong ;
Wang, Jing ;
Yang, Feng .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 714