Noncompliance and Instrumental Variables for 2K Factorial Experiments

被引:4
作者
Blackwell, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Pashley, Nicole E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Govt, Cambridge, MA 02143 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Inst Quantitat Social Sci, Cambridge, MA 02143 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Stat, Piscataway, NJ USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Analysis of designed experiments; Causal inference; Factorial experiments; Instrumental variables; Noncompliance; CAUSAL INTERACTION; INFERENCE; TURNOUT; CALLS;
D O I
10.1080/01621459.2021.1978468
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Factorial experiments are widely used to assess the marginal, joint, and interactive effects of multiple concurrent factors. While a robust literature covers the design and analysis of these experiments, there is less work on how to handle treatment noncompliance in this setting. To fill this gap, we introduce a new methodology that uses the potential outcomes framework for analyzing 2(K) factorial experiments with noncompliance on any number of factors. This framework builds on and extends the literature on both instrumental variables and factorial experiments in several ways. First, we define novel, complier-specific quantities of interest for this setting and show how to generalize key instrumental variables assumptions. Second, we show how partial compliance across factors gives researchers a choice over different types of compliers to target in estimation. Third, we show how to conduct inference for these new estimands from both the finite-population and superpopulation asymptotic perspectives. Finally, we illustrate these techniques by applying them to a field experiment on the effectiveness of different forms of get-out-the-vote canvassing. New easy-to-use, open-source software implements the methodology. for this article are available online.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1114
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of treatment response models [J].
Abadie, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 113 (02) :231-263
[2]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[3]   Beyond LATE: Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect with an Instrumental Variable [J].
Aronow, Peter M. ;
Carnegie, Allison .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 21 (04) :492-506
[4]   Instrumental Variable Methods for Conditional Effects and Causal Interaction in Voter Mobilization Experiments [J].
Blackwell, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 112 (518) :590-599
[5]   Reducing Crime and Violence: Experimental Evidence from Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Liberia [J].
Blattman, Christopher ;
Jamison, Julian C. ;
Sheridan, Margaret .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (04) :1165-1206
[6]   Bounds on causal effects in three-arm trials with non-compliance [J].
Cheng, Jing ;
Small, Dylan S. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2006, 68 :815-836
[7]   Causal inference from 2K factorial designs by using potential outcomes [J].
Dasgupta, Tirthankar ;
Pillai, Natesh S. ;
Rubin, Donald B. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2015, 77 (04) :727-753
[8]   Improving the External Validity of Conjoint Analysis: The Essential Role of Profile Distribution [J].
de la Cuesta, Brandon ;
Egami, Naoki ;
Imai, Kosuke .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 30 (01) :19-45
[9]   Causal Interaction in Factorial Experiments: Application to Conjoint Analysis [J].
Egami, Naoki ;
Imai, Kosuke .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 114 (526) :529-540
[10]  
FIELLER EC, 1954, J ROY STAT SOC B, V16, P175