Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation

被引:6
作者
Gil, Natalie [1 ]
Su, Helen [3 ]
Kaur, Kirandeep [1 ]
Barnett, Michael [4 ,5 ]
Murray, Anna [4 ,5 ]
Duffy, Stephen [6 ]
von Wagner, Christian [2 ]
Kerrison, Robert S. [7 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, London WC1E 7HB, England
[2] UCL, Behav Sci & Hlth, Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, London, England
[3] UCL, Fac Med Sci, London, England
[4] Cheshire & Merseyside Canc Alliance, Chester, Cheshire, England
[5] Cheshire & Merseyside Canc Alliance, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[6] Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Prevent Detect & Diag, London, England
[7] Univ Surrey, Sch Hlth Sci, Canc Care, Guildford, Surrey, England
关键词
colorectal cancer; colorectal neoplasms; faecal immunochemical testing; multivariate analysis; patient experience; patient satisfaction; personal satisfaction; two-week-wait; PRIMARY-CARE;
D O I
10.3399/BJGP.2022.0241
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Recent evidence suggests that faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in symptomatic adults. To date, there has been little research exploring experiences of FIT for this population. Aim To explore patient experience and satisfaction with FIT in an 'early adopter' site in England. Design Explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach combining mailed quantitative surveys with semi-structured telephone interviews. Method Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse quantitative data. Thematic analysis was used to assess qualitative transcripts. Results The survey had 260 responders, and it found that satisfaction with FIT was high (88.7%). Compared with test satisfaction, the proportion of responders satisfied with their GP consultation and how they received their results was lower (74.4% and 76.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that increased area-level deprivation and not receiving an explanation of the purpose of the test were associated with lower satisfaction with the GP consultation (both P-values <0.05), while increased area-level deprivation and not receiving results from the GP were associated with lower satisfaction with receiving results (both P-values <0.05). Interviews with responders (n = 20) helped explain the quantitative results. They revealed that 'not knowing the purpose of the test' caused 'anxiety' and 'confusion', which led to dissatisfaction. 'Not receiving results from GP' was considered 'unacceptable', asthis left patients with a 'niggling doubt' and lack of diagnosis or assurance that they did not have cancer. Conclusion Patient satisfaction with symptomatic FIT is high. Efforts to improve satisfaction should focus on ensuring that patients understand the purpose of the test and always receive their test results.
引用
收藏
页码:E104 / E114
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Assessment of patient satisfaction level in the State University of Haiti Hospital and responsible factors: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study protocol
    Millien, Hugins
    Joseph, Thaimye
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [22] Evaluating experiences, usability and patient satisfaction with telehealth for tertiary outpatient physiotherapy services during COVID-19: A mixed-methods study
    Ceprnja, Dragana
    Clark, Tracey
    Young, Jonathan
    Lee, Rebecca
    Flynn, Kylie
    Maka, Katherine
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (09) : 1929 - 1937
  • [23] Patient Anxiety and Communication Experience in the Emergency Department: A Mobile, Web-Based, Mixed-Methods Study on Patient Isolation During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Kim, Sumin
    Chang, Hansol
    Kim, Taerim
    Cha, Won Chul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (39)
  • [24] Using the trauma patient experience and evaluation of hospital discharge practices to inform practice change: A mixed methods study
    Goldsmith, Helen
    McCloughen, Andrea
    Curtis, Kate
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (7-8) : 1589 - 1598
  • [25] The Integrated Pain Team: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Impact of an Embedded Interdisciplinary Pain Care Intervention on Primary Care Team Satisfaction, Confidence, and Perceptions of Care Effectiveness
    Purcell, Natalie
    Zamora, Kara
    Tighe, Jenny
    Li, Yongmei
    Douraghi, Mathew
    Seal, Karen
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (09) : 1748 - 1763
  • [26] Patient and Provider Experiences With a Digital App to Improve Compliance With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols: Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Canadian Experience
    Beesoon, Sanjay
    Drobot, Ashley
    Smokeyday, Melissa
    Ali, Al-Bakir
    Collins, Zoe
    Reynolds, Colin
    Berzins, Sandra
    Gibson, Alison
    Nelson, Gregg
    [J]. JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2023, 7