Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation

被引:6
|
作者
Gil, Natalie [1 ]
Su, Helen [3 ]
Kaur, Kirandeep [1 ]
Barnett, Michael [4 ,5 ]
Murray, Anna [4 ,5 ]
Duffy, Stephen [6 ]
von Wagner, Christian [2 ]
Kerrison, Robert S. [7 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, London WC1E 7HB, England
[2] UCL, Behav Sci & Hlth, Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, London, England
[3] UCL, Fac Med Sci, London, England
[4] Cheshire & Merseyside Canc Alliance, Chester, Cheshire, England
[5] Cheshire & Merseyside Canc Alliance, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[6] Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Prevent Detect & Diag, London, England
[7] Univ Surrey, Sch Hlth Sci, Canc Care, Guildford, Surrey, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2023年 / 73卷 / 727期
关键词
colorectal cancer; colorectal neoplasms; faecal immunochemical testing; multivariate analysis; patient experience; patient satisfaction; personal satisfaction; two-week-wait; PRIMARY-CARE;
D O I
10.3399/BJGP.2022.0241
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Recent evidence suggests that faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in symptomatic adults. To date, there has been little research exploring experiences of FIT for this population. Aim To explore patient experience and satisfaction with FIT in an 'early adopter' site in England. Design Explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach combining mailed quantitative surveys with semi-structured telephone interviews. Method Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse quantitative data. Thematic analysis was used to assess qualitative transcripts. Results The survey had 260 responders, and it found that satisfaction with FIT was high (88.7%). Compared with test satisfaction, the proportion of responders satisfied with their GP consultation and how they received their results was lower (74.4% and 76.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that increased area-level deprivation and not receiving an explanation of the purpose of the test were associated with lower satisfaction with the GP consultation (both P-values <0.05), while increased area-level deprivation and not receiving results from the GP were associated with lower satisfaction with receiving results (both P-values <0.05). Interviews with responders (n = 20) helped explain the quantitative results. They revealed that 'not knowing the purpose of the test' caused 'anxiety' and 'confusion', which led to dissatisfaction. 'Not receiving results from GP' was considered 'unacceptable', asthis left patients with a 'niggling doubt' and lack of diagnosis or assurance that they did not have cancer. Conclusion Patient satisfaction with symptomatic FIT is high. Efforts to improve satisfaction should focus on ensuring that patients understand the purpose of the test and always receive their test results.
引用
收藏
页码:E104 / E114
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation
    Gil, Natalie
    Su, Helen
    Kaur, Kirandeep
    Barnett, Michael
    Murray, Anna
    Duffy, Stephen
    von Wagner, Christian
    Kerrison, Robert S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021,
  • [2] Patient experience, satisfaction and shared decision-making in colorectal cancer screening: protocol of the mixed-methods study CyDESA
    Selva, Anna
    Lopez, Pilar
    Puig, Teresa
    Macia, Francesc
    Selva, Clara
    Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda
    Terraza, Rebeca
    Buron, Andrea
    Machlab, Salvador Tarek
    Pericay, Carles
    Sola, Ivan
    Tora, Nuria
    Rodriguez, Vanesa
    Barrufet, Cristina
    Aymar, Anna
    Bare, Marisa
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [3] Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Kim H. Wadsworth
    Trevor G. Archibald
    Allison E. Payne
    Anita K. Cleary
    Byron L. Haney
    Adam S. Hoverman
    BMC Family Practice, 20
  • [4] Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Wadsworth, Kim H.
    Archibald, Trevor G.
    Payne, Allison E.
    Cleary, Anita K.
    Haney, Byron L.
    Hoverman, Adam S.
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [5] User-experience and patient satisfaction with quality of tuberculosis care in India: A mixed-methods literature review
    Bhatnagar, Himani
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL TUBERCULOSIS AND OTHER MYCOBACTERIAL DISEASES, 2019, 17
  • [6] A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Patient Education Materials for Colorectal Cancer
    Kang, Ravinder
    Saunders, Catherine H.
    Carpenter-Song, Elizabeth A.
    Moore, Kayla O.
    Trooboff, Spencer W.
    Columbo, Jesse A.
    Goodney, Philip P.
    Wong, Sandra L.
    Ivatury, Srinivas Joga
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (10) : 1249 - 1258
  • [7] The effects of cancer research participation on patient experience: a mixed-methods analysis
    Mc Grath-Lone, L.
    Ward, H.
    Schoenborn, C.
    Day, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2016, 25 (06) : 1056 - 1064
  • [8] Patient Satisfaction and Experience with Same-Day Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Mixed-Methods study
    Kleipool, Suzanne C.
    Willinge, Gijs J. A.
    Mathijssen, Elke G. E.
    Romijnders, Kim A. G. J.
    de Castro, Steve M. M.
    Marsman, Hendrik A.
    van Rutte, Pim W. J.
    van Veen, Ruben N.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (08) : 2862 - 2871
  • [9] Faecal immunochemical testing and blood tests for prioritization of urgent colorectal cancer referrals in symptomatic patients: a 2-year evaluation
    Bailey, J. A.
    Weller, J.
    Chapman, C. J.
    Ford, A.
    Hardy, K.
    Oliver, S.
    Morling, J. R.
    Simpson, J. A.
    Humes, D. J.
    Banerjea, A.
    BJS OPEN, 2021, 5 (02):
  • [10] The Experiences of Patients With Vanishing Twin Syndrome: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Patient Satisfaction and Miscarriage Information
    Cubbage, Nichole M.
    Embleton, Nicholas
    Levy, Carly
    TWIN RESEARCH AND HUMAN GENETICS, 2025,