Dose and fractionation regimen for brachytherapy boost in cervical cancer in the US

被引:3
作者
Hsieh, Kristin [1 ]
Bloom, Julie R. [1 ]
Dickstein, Daniel R. [1 ]
Hsieh, Celina [2 ]
Marshall, Deborah [1 ]
Ghiassi-Nejad, Zahra [3 ]
Raince, Jagdeep [4 ]
Lymberis, Stella [4 ]
Chadha, Manjeet [1 ]
Gupta, Vishal [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Providence, RI USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
[4] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
关键词
Cervical cancer; Interstitial brachytherapy; Intracavitary brachytherapy; High dose rate (HDR); Radiotherapy; LOCALLY ADVANCED-CARCINOMA; SOCIETY CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. Curative-intent radiotherapy for locally advanced and select early stage cervical cancer in the US includes external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with brachytherapy. Although there are guidelines for brachytherapy dose and fractionation regimens, there are limited data on practice patterns. This study aims to evaluate the contemporary utilization of cervical cancer brachytherapy in the US and its association with patient demographics and facility characteristics. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed clinical covariates of cervical cancer patients diagnosed and treated in 2018-2020 with curative-intent radiotherapy from the 2020 National Cancer Database. Associations between patient and institutional factors with the number of brachytherapy fractions were identified with logistic regression. Factors with association (p < 0.10) were then included in a multivariable logistic regression model. All tests were two-sided with significance <0.05 unless specified otherwise. Results. Among the eligible 2517 patients, 97.3% received HDR or LDR and is further analyzed. More patients received HDR than LDR brachytherapy (98.9% vs 1.1%) and intracavitary than interstitial brachytherapy (86.4% vs 13.6%). The most common number of HDR fractions prescribed were 5 (51.0%), 4 (32.9%), and 3 (8.6%). After adjusting for the other variables in the model, ethnicity, private insurance status, overall insurance status, and facility type were the only factors that were significantly associated with the number of brachytherapy factions (p < 0.0001, p = 0.028, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001, respectively, n = 2184). Conclusions. In the US, various HDR brachytherapy regimens are utilized depending on patient and institutional factors. Future research may optimize cervical cancer brachytherapy by correlating specific dose and fractionation regimens with patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Racial disparities in brachytherapy administration and survival in women with locally advanced cervical cancer
    Alimena, Stephanie
    Yang, David D.
    Melamed, Alexander
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Worley, Michael J., Jr.
    Feldman, Sarah
    Elias, Kevin M.
    Orio, Peter F.
    Lee, Larissa J.
    King, Martin
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 (03) : 595 - 601
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2023, ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier
  • [3] Brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: a review
    Banerjee, Robyn
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 6 : 555 - 564
  • [4] Cancer of the cervix uteri
    Bhatla, Neerja
    Aoki, Daisuke
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 : 22 - 36
  • [5] Socioeconomic and Racial Determinants of Brachytherapy Utilization for Cervical Cancer: Concerns for Widening Disparities
    Boyce-Fappiano, David
    Nguyen, Kevin A.
    Gjyshi, Olsi
    Manzar, Gohar
    Abana, Chike O.
    Klopp, Ann H.
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    Orio, Peter F.
    Thaker, Nikhil G.
    Mourtada, Firas
    Venkat, Puja
    Chang, Albert J.
    [J]. JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 17 (12) : 783 - +
  • [6] Disparities Among Cervical Cancer Patients Receiving Brachytherapy
    Bruce, Shaina F.
    Joshi, Tanvi V.
    Chervoneva, Inna
    Yi, Misung
    Chatterjee-Paer, Sudeshna
    Burton, Elizabeth R.
    Edelson, Mitchell I.
    Sorosky, Joel I.
    Shahin, Mark S.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 134 (03) : 559 - 569
  • [7] Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline
    Chino, Junzo
    Annunziata, Christina M.
    Beriwal, Sushil
    Bradfield, Lisa
    Erickson, Beth A.
    Fields, Emma C.
    Fitch, KathrynJane
    Harkenrider, Matthew M.
    Holschneider, Christine H.
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    Leung, Eric
    Lin, Lilie L.
    Mayadev, Jyoti S.
    Morcos, Marc
    Nwachukwu, Chika
    Petereit, Daniel
    Viswanathan, Akila N.
    [J]. PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10 (04) : 220 - 234
  • [8] High-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer. Analysis of dose effectiveness and late complications
    Ferrigno, R
    Novaes, PERD
    Pellizzon, ACA
    Maia, MAC
    Fogarolli, RC
    Gentil, AC
    Salvajoli, JV
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (05): : 1123 - 1135
  • [9] Patient Outcome Study of Concurrent Chemoradiation, External Beam Radiotherapy, and High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Carcinoma of the Cervix
    Forrest, Jennifer Louise
    Ackerman, Ida
    Barbera, Lisa
    Barnes, Elizabeth A.
    Davidson, Melanie
    Kiss, Alex
    Thomas, Gillian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (06) : 1074 - 1078
  • [10] Cervical cancer screening in the United States: Challenges and potential solutions for underscreened groups
    Fuzzell, Lindsay N.
    Perkins, Rebecca B.
    Christy, Shannon M.
    Lake, Paige W.
    Vadaparampil, Susan T.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 144