Comparative performance analysis of simple U-Net, residual attention U-Net, and VGG16-U-Net for inventory inland water bodies

被引:8
|
作者
Ghaznavi, Ali [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Saberioon, Mohammadmehdi [3 ]
Brom, Jakub [4 ]
Itzerott, Sibylle [3 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energy & Climate Res IEK9, Wilhelm Johnen Str, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[2] Univ South Bohemia Ceske Budejovice, Inst Complex Syst, Fac Fisheries & Protect Waters, South Bohemian Res Ctr Aquaculture & Biodivers Hyd, Zamek 136, Nove Hrady 37333, Czech Republic
[3] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam GFZ, Sect Remote Sensing & Geoinformat 1 4, German Res Ctr Geosci, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[4] Univ South Bohemia Ceske Budjeovice, Fac Agr & Technol, Dept Appl Ecol, Studentska 1668, Studentska 37005, Czech Republic
来源
关键词
Automated mapping; Deep learning; Land cover; Satellite imagery; Segmentation; Water bodies; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.acags.2023.100150
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Inland water bodies play a vital role at all scales in the terrestrial water balance and Earth's climate variability. Thus, an inventory of inland waters is crucially important for hydrologic and ecological studies and management. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to develop a deep learning-based method for inventorying and mapping inland water bodies using the RGB band of high-resolution satellite imagery automatically and accurately.The Sentinel-2 Harmonized dataset, together with ZABAGED-validated ground truth, was used as the main dataset for the model training step. Three different deep learning algorithms based on U-Net architecture were employed to segment inland waters, including a simple U-Net, Residual Attention U-Net, and VGG16-U-Net. All three algorithms were trained using a combination of Sentinel-2 visible bands (Red [B04; 665nm], Green [B03; 560nm], and Blue [B02; 490 nm]) at a 10-meter spatial resolution.The Residual Attention U-Net achieved the highest computational cost due to the increased number of trainable parameters. The VGG16-U-Net had the shortest run time and the lowest number of trainable parameters, attributed to its architecture compared to the simple and Residual Attention U-Net architectures, respectively. As a result, the VGG16-U-Net provided the best segmentation results with a mean-IoU score of 0.9850, a slight improvement compared to other proposed U-Net-based architectures.Although the accuracy of the model based on VGG16-U-Net does not make a difference from Residual Attention U-Net, the computation costs for training VGG16-U-Net were dramatically lower than Residual Attention U-Net.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chaining a U-Net With a Residual U-Net for Retinal Blood Vessels Segmentation
    Alfonso Francia, Gendry
    Pedraza, Carlos
    Aceves, Marco
    Tovar-Arriaga, Saul
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 38493 - 38500
  • [2] UIU-Net: U-Net in U-Net for Infrared Small Object Detection
    Wu, Xin
    Hong, Danfeng
    Chanussot, Jocelyn
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2023, 32 : 364 - 376
  • [3] SAR U-Net: Spatial attention residual U-Net structure for water body segmentation from remote sensing satellite images
    Naga Surekha Jonnala
    Neha Gupta
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83 : 44425 - 44454
  • [4] SAR U-Net: Spatial attention residual U-Net structure for water body segmentation from remote sensing satellite images
    Jonnala, Naga Surekha
    Gupta, Neha
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 83 (15) : 44425 - 44454
  • [5] Chimeric U-Net - Modifying the standard U-Net towards explainability
    Schulze, Kenrick
    Peppert, Felix
    Schuette, Christof
    Sunkara, Vikram
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2025, 338
  • [6] Attention U-Net for Kidney and Masses
    Lee, Duho
    Choi, Heeyeon
    KIDNEY AND KIDNEY TUMOR SEGMENTATION, KITS 2023, 2024, 14540 : 139 - 142
  • [7] AResU-Net: Attention Residual U-Net for Brain Tumor Segmentation
    Zhang, Jianxin
    Lv, Xiaogang
    Zhang, Hengbo
    Liu, Bin
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (05):
  • [8] U-Net vs Transformer: Is U-Net Outdated in Medical Image Registration?
    Jia, Xi
    Bartlett, Joseph
    Zhang, Tianyang
    Lu, Wenqi
    Qiu, Zhaowen
    Duan, Jinming
    MACHINE LEARNING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, MLMI 2022, 2022, 13583 : 151 - 160
  • [9] Breast tumor segmentation in ultrasound images: comparing U-net and U-net + +
    de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo Gonçalves
    Vieira, Sílvio Leão
    Paranaiba, Caio Felipe Brito
    Itikawa, Emerson Nobuyuki
    Research on Biomedical Engineering, 2025, 41 (01)
  • [10] Wavelet U-Net: Incorporating Wavelet Transform Into U-Net for Liver Segmentation
    Chang, J.
    Chang, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)