Risk-Aware Markov Decision Process Contingency Management Autonomy for Uncrewed Aircraft Systems

被引:1
作者
Sharma, Prashin [1 ,5 ]
Kraske, Benjamin [2 ]
Kim, Joseph [3 ]
Laouar, Zakariya [2 ]
Sunberg, Zachary [2 ]
Atkins, Ella [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, 2505 Hayward St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Aerosp Engn Sci, 3775 Discovery Dr, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, 2505 Hayward St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Kevin T Crofton Aerosp andOcean Engn Dept, Randolph Hall,460 Old Turner St, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[5] Boeing Res & Technol, Ladson, SC 29456 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 21卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Unmanned Aircraft System; Emergency Landing; Markov Decision Process; Urban Air Mobility; Contingency Management; UAV Software Systems; POMDP; Prognostics and Health Management; Risk Management; Reinforcement Learning; HEALTH MANAGEMENT; EMERGENCY; DIAGNOSIS; PROGNOSIS; STATE;
D O I
10.2514/1.I011235
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Uncrewed aircraft systems (UASs) are being increasingly adopted for a variety of applications. The risk UAS poses to people and property must be kept to acceptable levels. This paper proposes risk-aware contingency management autonomy to prevent an accident in the event of component malfunction, specifically propulsion unit failure and/or battery degradation. The proposed autonomy is modeled as a Markov decision process (MDP), whose solution is a contingency management policy that appropriately executes emergency landing, flight termination, or continuation of planned flight actions. Motivated by the potential for errors in fault/failure indicators, the partial observability of the MDP state space is investigated. The performance of optimal policies is analyzed over varying observability conditions in a high-fidelity simulator. Results indicate that both partially observable MDP and maximum a posteriori MDP policies had similar performance over different state observability criteria, given the nearly deterministic state transition model.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 248
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[21]  
Kochenderfer M. J., 2022, ALGORITHMS DECISION
[23]  
Kurniawati Hanna, 2009, Robotics: Science and Systems IV, P65
[24]  
LEE H, 2020, PROC IEEE GLOBECOM W, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1109/GCWkshps50303.2020.9367572, DOI 10.1109/GCWKSHPS50303.2020.9367572]
[25]  
Littman M. L., 1995, Machine Learning. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, P362
[26]   Prognostics for state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on combination Gaussian process functional regression [J].
Liu, Datong ;
Pang, Jingyue ;
Zhou, Jianbao ;
Peng, Yu ;
Pecht, Michael .
MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2013, 53 (06) :832-839
[27]   Safe2Ditch: Emergency Landing for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems [J].
Lusk, Parker C. ;
Glaab, Patricia C. ;
Glaab, Louis J. ;
Beard, Randal W. .
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 16 (08) :327-339
[28]  
Mehra R, 1998, 1998 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL 2, P133, DOI 10.1109/AERO.1998.687904
[29]  
Mueller MW, 2014, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P45, DOI 10.1109/ICRA.2014.6906588
[30]  
Ng A. Y., 2000, P 17 INT C MACH LEAR, V1, P2