Risk-Aware Markov Decision Process Contingency Management Autonomy for Uncrewed Aircraft Systems

被引:1
作者
Sharma, Prashin [1 ,5 ]
Kraske, Benjamin [2 ]
Kim, Joseph [3 ]
Laouar, Zakariya [2 ]
Sunberg, Zachary [2 ]
Atkins, Ella [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, 2505 Hayward St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Aerosp Engn Sci, 3775 Discovery Dr, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, 2505 Hayward St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Kevin T Crofton Aerosp andOcean Engn Dept, Randolph Hall,460 Old Turner St, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[5] Boeing Res & Technol, Ladson, SC 29456 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 21卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Unmanned Aircraft System; Emergency Landing; Markov Decision Process; Urban Air Mobility; Contingency Management; UAV Software Systems; POMDP; Prognostics and Health Management; Risk Management; Reinforcement Learning; HEALTH MANAGEMENT; EMERGENCY; DIAGNOSIS; PROGNOSIS; STATE;
D O I
10.2514/1.I011235
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Uncrewed aircraft systems (UASs) are being increasingly adopted for a variety of applications. The risk UAS poses to people and property must be kept to acceptable levels. This paper proposes risk-aware contingency management autonomy to prevent an accident in the event of component malfunction, specifically propulsion unit failure and/or battery degradation. The proposed autonomy is modeled as a Markov decision process (MDP), whose solution is a contingency management policy that appropriately executes emergency landing, flight termination, or continuation of planned flight actions. Motivated by the potential for errors in fault/failure indicators, the partial observability of the MDP state space is investigated. The performance of optimal policies is analyzed over varying observability conditions in a high-fidelity simulator. Results indicate that both partially observable MDP and maximum a posteriori MDP policies had similar performance over different state observability criteria, given the nearly deterministic state transition model.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 248
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471221279
[2]   Emergency flight planning applied to total loss of thrust [J].
Atkins, Ella M. ;
Portillo, Igor Alonso ;
Strube, Matthew J. .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2006, 43 (04) :1205-1216
[3]  
Baculi J. E., 2019, AIAA SCIT 2019 FOR, P1457, DOI [/10.2514/6.2019-1457, DOI 10.2514/6.2019-1457]
[4]  
Balaban E., 2013, ANN C PROGN HLTH MAN, V5, P1, DOI [10.36001/phmconf.2013.v5i1.2294, DOI 10.36001/PHMCONF.2013.V5I1.2294]
[5]  
Balaban E., 2013, INT J PROGN HEALTH M, V4, P87, DOI DOI 10.36001/IJPHM.2013.V4I1.1449
[6]   THE INTERACTING MULTIPLE MODEL ALGORITHM FOR SYSTEMS WITH MARKOVIAN SWITCHING COEFFICIENTS [J].
BLOM, HAP ;
BARSHALOM, Y .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1988, 33 (08) :780-783
[7]   Characterization and Prognosis of Multirotor Failures [J].
Brown, Joseph M. ;
Coffey, Jesse A. ;
Harvey, Dustin ;
Thayer, Jordan M. .
Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Detection, Vol 7, 2015, :157-173
[8]  
Castagno J., 2021, Handbook of Reinforcement Learning and Control, P613, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-60990-0_20
[9]   High performance and safe flight of full-scale helicopters from takeoff to landing with an ensemble of planners [J].
Choudhury, Sanjiban ;
Dugar, Vishal ;
Maeta, Silvio ;
MacAllister, Brian ;
Arora, Sankalp ;
Althoff, Daniel ;
Scherer, Sebastian .
JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS, 2019, 36 (08) :1275-1332
[10]  
Daigle M. J., ANN C PHM SOC OCT, DOI [10.36001/phmconf.2010.v2i1.1902, DOI 10.36001/PHMCONF.2010.V2I1.1902]