Environmental agency, moral reasoning, and moral disengagement in adults

被引:0
作者
Gialdi, Giulia [1 ]
Somma, Antonella [1 ]
Songhorian, Sarah [2 ]
Bergamelli, Nicole [1 ]
Frau, Claudia [3 ]
Fossati, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Sch Psychol, via Stamira Ancona 20, I-20127 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Sch Philosophy, Milan, Italy
[3] ISIPSE Inst, Rome, Italy
关键词
Climate change; self-agency; other-agency; image-based task; prosocial moral reasoning; moral disengagement; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIFACTOR MODEL; SELF-EFFICACY; IMAGERY; DIMENSIONALITY; PERSPECTIVE; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1080/10508422.2023.2267705
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To assess the relationships between environmental agency, prosocial moral reasoning, and civic moral disengagement, 544 community-dwelling adults were administered the image-based Environmental Agency Scale (EAS), the Prosocial Moral Reasoning Objective Measure (PROM), and the Civic Moral Disengagement Scale (CMDS). The EAS Agentic Self and Agentic Other dimensions proved to be reliable measures and showed adequate factor validity. Mean/median score comparisons between EAS Agentic Self Scale and Agentic Other Scale scores indicated that participants viewed society-level actions as more relevant than individual-level actions when environment defense is at issue. Partial correlation analysis results showed that environmental agentic self was grounded in individual differences in prosocial moral reasoning. Civic moral disengagement yielded negative associations with EAS Agentic Other Scale scores, providing further support to the relevance of moral disengagement process in environmental sensitivity. These results may improve our understanding of environmental agency and its connections with prosocial moral reasoning and moral disengagement.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 87
页数:15
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Moral reasoning in adaptation to climate change
    Adger, W. Neil
    Butler, Catherine
    Walker-Springett, Kate
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2017, 26 (03) : 371 - 390
  • [2] Bandura A, 1996, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V71, P364, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
  • [3] Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
  • [4] Bandura A., 1991, HDB MORAL BEHAV DEV, P45
  • [5] Impeding ecological sustainability through selective moral disengagement
    Bandura, Albert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 2 (01) : 8 - 35
  • [6] BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • [7] Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling of Personality Data
    Booth, Tom
    Hughes, David J.
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2014, 21 (03) : 260 - 271
  • [8] Braidotti Rosi., 2019, Posthuman Knowledge
  • [9] Browne MW, 1993, Testing Structural Equation Models, P136
  • [10] Assessing Moral Judgment Maturity Using the Sociomoral Reflection Measure - Short Form Objective
    Brugman, Daniel
    Beerthuizen, Marinus G. C. J.
    Helmond, Petra
    Basinger, Karen S.
    Gibbs, John C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2023, 39 (02) : 85 - 95