Patients' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to accessing support through primary care for common mental health problems in England: A systematic review

被引:4
作者
Tunks, Alice [1 ,4 ]
Berry, Clio [1 ]
Strauss, Clara [2 ,3 ]
Nyikavaranda, Patrick [1 ]
Ford, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Primary Care & Publ Hlth Dept, Brighton, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Sch Psychol, Brighton, England
[3] Sussex Partnership NHS Fdn Trust, Brighton, England
[4] Univ Brighton, Primary Care & Publ Hlth Dept, Falmer Campus,Room 104,Watson Bldg, Brighton BN1 9PH, England
关键词
Mental health; Primary care; Access; Common mental disorders; BLACK CARIBBEAN WOMEN; PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES; GENERAL-PRACTICE; ILLNESS STIGMA; HELP-SEEKING; PERINATAL DEPRESSION; INTERNALIZED STIGMA; ANXIETY DISORDERS; IMPROVING ACCESS; NON-ATTENDANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.035
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Common mental disorders (CMDs) are prevalent throughout the population. Psychological therapy is often sought via primary care; however, equitable access is not commonplace. This review aims to investigate the barriers and facilitators adults experiencing CMDs perceive when accessing evidence-based psychological treatment in England.Methods: A qualitative systematic review with meta-synthesis was conducted (PROSPERO CRD42020227039). Seven electronic databases were searched for papers from 2008 to October 2022. Results: Searches identified 30 studies from which three themes were developed with seven subthemes. Stigma and patients' perceptions and understandings of CMDs impacted their help-seeking decision-making and engagement with services. This meant that services were not used as a first resort for help-seeking. Upon reaching services, patients appeared to perceive primary care as not prioritising mental health problems, nor as being the place where they would be supported, particularly as healthcare professionals did not appear to know about CMDs and therapy was seen as difficult to access. The interaction between healthcare professional and patients was seen as pivotal to whether patients accessed support or not.Limitations: The review is limited to research conducted within England. Additionally, it only explores access barriers prior to treatment experiences.Conclusion: Knowledge, attitudinal, systemic and relational barriers and facilitators were identified. Future research should focus on developing stigma reduction initiatives. Clinical implications include provision of standardised training across primary care HCP (healthcare professionals).
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 340
页数:12
相关论文
共 125 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, Clinical Guideline 16
  • [2] BABCP, 2021, IMPR ACC PSYCH THER
  • [3] War, trauma and culture: working with Tamil refugees and asylum seekers using culturally adapted CBT
    Bahu, Meera
    [J]. COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPIST, 2019, 12
  • [4] Baker C, 2020, 6988 HOUS COMM LIB U
  • [5] Baker C, 2022, NHS KEY STAT ENGLAND
  • [6] Barnes M., 2019, PRIORITISING PHYS PS, P1
  • [7] Seeking help in times of economic hardship: access, experiences of services and unmet need
    Barnes, M. C.
    Donovan, J. L.
    Wilson, C.
    Chatwin, J.
    Davies, R.
    Potokar, J.
    Kapur, N.
    Hawton, K.
    O'Connor, R.
    Gunnell, D.
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 17 : 1 - 14
  • [8] The association of migration and ethnicity with use of the Improving Access to Psychological Treatment (IAPT) programme: a general population cohort study
    Bhavsar, Vishal
    Jannesari, Sohail
    McGuire, Philip
    MacCabe, James H.
    Das-Munshi, Jayati
    Bhugra, Dinesh
    Dorrington, Sarah
    Brown, June S. L.
    Hotopf, Matthew H.
    Hatch, Stephani L.
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 56 (11) : 1943 - 1956
  • [9] Non-attendance at psychological therapy appointments
    Binnie, James
    Boden, Zoe
    [J]. MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (03) : 231 - 248
  • [10] Stepped care in psychological therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency - Narrative literature review
    Bower, P
    Gilbody, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 186 : 11 - 17