Scoring the Value Assessment Framework for China: A Factorial Survey

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Mengmeng [1 ]
Yang, Yi [2 ,3 ]
Bao, Yun [4 ]
Kimber, Melissa [1 ,5 ]
Levine, Mitchell [1 ,6 ]
Xie, Feng [1 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Key Lab Hlth Technol Assessment, Natl Hlth Commiss, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Gansu Prov Hosp, Inst Clin Res & Evidence Based Med, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[5] McMaster Univ, Offord Ctr Child Studies, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Div Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal CHEPA, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
关键词
China; factorial study; value assessment framework; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; HEALTH ECONOMICS APPROACH; ANALYSIS MCDA; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2023.12.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to develop the scoring functions for the recently developed value assessment framework (VAF)for China, which comprises 12 attributes. Methods: We implemented a factorial survey among Chinese healthcare stakeholders from July to September 2022. A total of240 hypothetical drug value profiles described by the VAF were grouped into 60 blocks and randomly assigned to respondents. Each respondent was assigned with 1 block, each presented in 3 disease scenarios of different levels of severity. For each profile, respondents were asked to assess the drug's value on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) and make 1 ofthe 3 insurance recommendations: cover, to be negotiated for coverage, or reject. Linear and logistic mixed-effects models were used to develop scoring functions for aggregating the value attributes. Results: A total of 365 respondents participated in the survey. 3968 responses from 331 respondents were included in theanalysis. Most of the included respondents were under 45 (n = 256, 77.3%), females (n = 208, 62.8%), living in urban areas (n =296, 89.4%), and with a bachelor's degree or higher (n = 303, 91.5%). Health benefits and safety carried more weights thanother attributes in the scoring functions across disease scenarios. The value and probability of entering negotiation orreceiving insurance coverage for the attribute profiles for severe/critical disease were higher than for mild/moderate disease. Conclusions: The scoring functions of the VAF can be used to assess the value of a drug and its probability of entering negotiation or receiving insurance coverage in China.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 339
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prioritisation of specialist health care services; not NICE, not easy but it can be done
    Anderson, Pippa
    Webb, Philip
    Groves, Sam
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2017, 121 (09) : 978 - 985
  • [2] Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for HTA across four EU Member States: Piloting the Advance Value Framework
    Angelis, A.
    Linch, M.
    Montibeller, G.
    Molina-Lopez, T.
    Zawada, A.
    Orzel, K.
    Arickx, F.
    Espin, J.
    Kanavos, P.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2020, 246
  • [3] Angelis Aris, 2018, MDM Policy Pract, V3, p2381468318796218, DOI 10.1177/2381468318796218
  • [4] Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework
    Angelis, Aris
    Kanavos, Panos
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 188 : 137 - 156
  • [5] Announcement from National Healthcare Security Administration on the release of the, 2023 National Basic Medical Insurance, Work Injury Insurance and Maternity Insurance Drug Catalog Adjustment Work Plan"and Application Guidelines
  • [6] [Anonymous], HTA 101 2 FUNDAMENTA
  • [7] [Anonymous], Interpretation of the adjustment of the National Medical Insurance Drug Catalog in 2023
  • [8] [Anonymous], General methods-version 6.0
  • [9] [Anonymous], Announcement on the public solicitation of opinions on the guidelines for the management of comprehensive clinical evaluation of drugs
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2018, VALUE BASED PROGRAMS