Artificial intelligence for digital breast tomosynthesis: Impact on diagnostic performance, reading times, and workload in the era of personalized screening

被引:8
作者
Magni, Veronica [1 ]
Cozzi, Andrea [2 ]
Schiaffino, Simone [2 ]
Colarieti, Anna [2 ]
Sardanelli, Francesco [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Unit Radiol, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, I-20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Via Morandi 30, I-20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy
[4] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Unit Radiol, Via Morandi 30, I-20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy
关键词
Digital breast tomosynthesis; Digital mammography; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Breast cancer screening; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; CANCER OVERDIAGNOSIS; DETECTION SYSTEM; DENSE BREASTS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MRI; WOMEN; AI; METAANALYSIS; READER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110631
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The ultimate goals of the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) are the reduction of reading times, the increase of diagnostic performance, and the reduction of interval cancer rates. In this review, after outlining the journey from computer-aided detection/diagnosis systems to AI applied to digital mammography (DM), we summarize the results of studies where AI was applied to DBT, noting that long-term advantages of DBT screening and its crucial ability to decrease the interval cancer rate are still under scrutiny. AI has shown the capability to overcome some shortcomings of DBT in the screening setting by improving diag-nostic performance and by reducing recall rates (from-2 % to-27 %) and reading times (up to-53 %, with an average 20 % reduction), but the ability of AI to reduce interval cancer rates has not yet been clearly investi-gated. Prospective validation is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness and real-world impact of AI models assisting DBT interpretation, especially in large-scale studies with low breast cancer prevalence. Finally, we focus on the incoming era of personalized and risk-stratified screening that will first see the application of contrast -enhanced breast imaging to screen women with extremely dense breasts. As the diagnostic advantage of DBT over DM was concentrated in this category, we try to understand if the application of AI to DM in the remaining cohorts of women with heterogeneously dense or non-dense breast could close the gap in diagnostic performance between DM and DBT, thus neutralizing the usefulness of AI application to DBT.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
    Olinder, Jakob
    Johnson, Kristin
    Akesson, Anna
    Fornvik, Daniel
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (01)
  • [42] Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading
    Skaane, Per
    Osteras, Bjorn Helge
    Yanakiev, Stanimir
    Lie, Terese
    Eben, Ellen B.
    Gullien, Randi
    Brandal, Siri H. B.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (06) : 3912 - 3923
  • [43] Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
    Jakob Olinder
    Kristin Johnson
    Anna Åkesson
    Daniel Förnvik
    Sophia Zackrisson
    Breast Cancer Research, 25
  • [44] Traditional versus modern approaches to screening mammography: a comparison of computer-assisted detection for synthetic 2D mammography versus an artificial intelligence algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis
    Bahl, Manisha
    Kshirsagar, Ashwini
    Pohlman, Scott
    Lehman, Constance D.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2025, : 529 - 537
  • [45] Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment
    Giess, Catherine S.
    Pourjabbar, Sarvenaz
    Ip, Ivan K.
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Alper, Emily
    Khorasani, Ramin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (04) : 929 - 934
  • [46] Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Coley, Rebecca Yates
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Onega, Tracy
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Lee, Janie M.
    Herschorn, Sally
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Rauscher, Garth
    Lee, Christoph, I
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (07)
  • [47] An era of personalized medicine in breast cancer: integrating artificial intelligence into practice
    Masood, Nosheen
    Wu, San-Gang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [48] Improving Accuracy and Efficiency with Concurrent Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Conant, Emily F.
    Toledano, Alicia Y.
    Periaswamy, Senthil
    Fotin, Sergei, V
    Go, Jonathan
    Boatsman, Justin E.
    Hoffmeister, Jeffrey W.
    RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 1 (04)
  • [49] Revolutionising osseous biopsy: the impact of artificial intelligence in the era of personalized medicine
    Isaac, Amanda
    Klontzas, Michail E.
    Dalili, Danoob
    Akdogan, Asli Irmak
    Fawzi, Mohamed
    Gugliemi, Giuseppe
    Filippiadis, Dimitrios
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [50] The environmental impact of digital technology and artificial intelligence, in the era of digital pathology
    Guillory, Thomas
    Tilmant, Cyprien
    Trecourt, Alexis
    Gaillot-Durand, Lucie
    ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 2024, 44 (05) : 353 - 360