Flexible 3D-Printable Materials for Application in Medical Research: A Comprehensive Comparison of Commercially Available Materials

被引:2
|
作者
Grab, Maximilian [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Jaud, Simone [1 ,3 ]
Thierfelder, Nikolaus [1 ,3 ]
Hagl, Christian [1 ,3 ]
Wimmer, Bettina [1 ]
Ahrens, Markus [2 ]
Stana, Jan [4 ]
Mela, Petra [2 ]
Grefen, Linda [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, LMU Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Engn & Design, Chair Med Mat & Implants, Dept Mech Engn,Munich Inst Biomed Engn, Munich, Germany
[3] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, LMU Univ Hosp, Div Vasc Surg, Munich, Germany
[5] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, LMU Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
关键词
3D printing; medical; material testing; material characteristics; flexible; compliance; 3D; MODELS;
D O I
10.1089/3dp.2023.0179
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing has become an important tool in modern medicine with numerous applications such as therapy planning, medical device prototyping and testing, and basic research. While the range of available materials continues to grow, the field of elastic printable materials for medical applications has not been fully explored. Therefore, this study focuses on the comparison of six commercially available flexible printing materials regarding their usability in the medical field. Surface of printed parts for all materials were analyzed directly after printing by scanning electron microscopy. The mechanical behavior was evaluated by uniaxial tensile tests, shore A hardness, and vascular compliance analysis. The degradation effects of the solvents water, glycerin, and ethanol were analyzed over a period of 7 days. The impact of different sterilization protocols (steam, plasma, ethylene oxide) was determined by tensile testing and surface imaging. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by a WST-1 proliferation assay with human endothelial cells. Microscopic imaging revealed a uniform surface with characteristic topologies depending on the printing technique. Different sterilization techniques revealed good results, however, pure silicone material TrueSil (R) showed complete mechanical failure after plasma sterilization. All materials demonstrated high resistance to water and glycerin exposure with only slight weight changes. Ethanol exposure led to significant increases in wet weight with Agilus30 reaching a weight increase of 104.6%. All materials except Aceo showed a decrease in dry weight after ethanol exposure. Formlabs' Flexible 80A and Elastic 50A, as well as Agilus30, showed high cytotoxicity with no cell viability after 24 h. Aceo and TrueSil silicone materials revealed adequate cytocompatibility with viable cells even after 7 days. Static and dynamic vascular elasticity of all tested materials revealed linear elastic behavior. The tested materials offer unique material properties for different use cases, with the recapitulation of vascular elasticity still being a weak point of current printing technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterisation and Comparison of Material Parameters of 3D-Printable Absorbing Materials
    Pluss, Tobias
    Zimmer, Felix
    Hehn, Tobias
    Murk, Axel
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (04)
  • [2] 3D-Printable Materials for Microbial Liquid Culture
    Walsh, Matthew E.
    Ostrinskaya, Alla
    Sorensen, Morgan T.
    Kong, David S.
    Carr, Peter A.
    3D PRINTING AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2016, 3 (02) : 113 - 118
  • [3] Comparison of the tensile modulus of three 3D-printable materials used in dentistry
    Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna Maria
    Wieckiewicz, Mieszko
    Mikulewicz, Marcin
    Malysa, Andrzej
    Dus-Ilnicka, Irena
    Seweryn, Piotr
    Laskowska, Joanna
    Pollamann, Maria Cristina Figueiredo
    Adamska, Malgorzata
    Wezgowiec, Joanna
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2023, 60 (03) : 505 - 511
  • [4] A performance evaluation of commercially available and 3D-printable prosthetic hands: a comparison using the anthropomorphic hand assessment protocol
    Joshua R. Siegel
    Jedidiah K. Harwood
    Annette C. Lau
    Dylan J. A. Brenneis
    Michael R. Dawson
    Patrick M. Pilarski
    Jonathon S. Schofield
    BMC Biomedical Engineering, 6 (1):
  • [5] Enhancement of 3D-Printable Materials by Dual-Curing Procedures
    Fernandez-Francos, Xavier
    Konuray, Osman
    Ramis, Xavier
    Serra, Angels
    De la Flor, Silvia
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [6] Thermal and acoustic performance evaluation of 3D-Printable PLA materials
    Islam, Shafiqul
    Bhat, Gajanan
    Sikdar, Partha
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 67
  • [7] 3D-Printable Photochromic Molecular Materials for Reversible Information Storage
    Wales, Dominic J.
    Cao, Qun
    Kastner, Katharina
    Karjalainen, Erno
    Newton, Graham N.
    Sans, Victor
    ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2018, 30 (26)
  • [8] 3D-printable biopolymer-based materials for water treatment: A review
    Fijo, Natalia
    Aguilar-Sanchez, Andrea
    Mathew, Aji P.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 430
  • [9] Recent advances in 3D-printable aggregation-induced emission materials
    Zhang, Mingtao
    Li, Yu
    Ma, Guangmeng
    Guo, Fawei
    Wu, Haixin
    Wu, Han
    Jin, Qingxin
    Luo, Xin
    Luo, Chunyi
    Li, Jiaqi
    Long, Yu
    MATERIALS FUTURES, 2024, 3 (04):
  • [10] 3D-printable biopolymer-based materials for water treatment: A review
    Fijol, Natalia
    Aguilar-Sánchez, Andrea
    Mathew, Aji P.
    Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 430