The Turkish version of nursing practice readiness scale: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation

被引:1
作者
Baris, Veysel Karani [1 ]
Yilmaz, Aysegul [2 ]
Celik, Isa [3 ]
Keskin, Ayse Yildiz [4 ]
Bektas, Murat [5 ]
Intepeler, Seyda Seren [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Nursing Fac, Nursing Management Dept, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Selcuk Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Midwifery Dept, Konya, Turkiye
[3] Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univ, Hlth Sci Fac, Nursing Dept, Rize, Turkiye
[4] Mersin Univ, Nursing Fac, Nursing Management Dept, Mersin, Turkiye
[5] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Nursing Fac, Child Hlth & Dis Nursing Dept, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
cross-cultural comparison; new graduate nurses; nursing; practice nursing; psychometrics;
D O I
10.1111/ijn.13254
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimThis study aims to adapt the "Nursing Practice Readiness Scale" to Turkish culture, and evaluate its psychometric properties.BackgroundNew graduates' nursing practice readiness can impact their work adaptation and performance.DesignThe research employed a methodological design.MethodsData were collected between May and July 2022. The sample consisted of 436 newly graduated nurses. Content validity, construct validity and criterion validity were evaluated. Reliability was examined with adjusted item-total correlation, Cronbach's a coefficient, composite-reliability and split-half reliability.ResultsThe Turkish version of Nursing Practice Readiness Scale was found to have good content and criterion validity. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the original five-factor structure of the scale was also confirmed for the Turkish version. The scale's overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient was determined to be 0.96, with subscale coefficients ranging from 0.73 to 0.94. The composite reliability values of the subscales were found between 0.75 and 0.94. In split-half reliability, the correlation coefficient between half was 0.952, with a Spearman-Brown Coefficient (Unequal Length) of 0.976.ResultsThe Turkish version of Nursing Practice Readiness Scale was found to have good content and criterion validity. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the original five-factor structure of the scale was also confirmed for the Turkish version. The scale's overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient was determined to be 0.96, with subscale coefficients ranging from 0.73 to 0.94. The composite reliability values of the subscales were found between 0.75 and 0.94. In split-half reliability, the correlation coefficient between half was 0.952, with a Spearman-Brown Coefficient (Unequal Length) of 0.976.ConclusionsThe Turkish version of Nursing Practice Readiness Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool for evaluating the nursing practice readiness of newly graduated nurses. What is already known about this topic? The nursing practice readiness of newly graduated nurses may impact their work adaptation and performance. Work adaptation is an important predictor of intention to leave the profession and productivity.What this paper adds? This study adapted the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale to Turkish culture, and evaluated its psychometric properties. The Turkish version of Nursing Practice Readiness Scale was shown to be a valid and reliable tool that can be used to evaluate newly graduated nurses' nursing practice readiness.The implications of this paper Nurse educators will be able to assess the readiness of graduating students for nursing practice by using the scale. Nurse managers will be able to evaluate the readiness of new graduate nurses for nursing practice using the scale. Nurse managers and educators will be able to identify areas that need to be prioritized to increase the readiness of newly graduated nurses for nursing practice by using the scale.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] FROM NOVICE TO EXPERT
    BENNER, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1982, 82 (03) : 402 - 407
  • [2] The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers' design work
    Bennett, Sue
    Agostinho, Shirley
    Lockyer, Lori
    [J]. ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 65 (01): : 125 - 145
  • [3] Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer
    Boateng, Godfred O.
    Neilands, Torsten B.
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R.
    Young, Sera L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [4] Brown TA, 2015, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, V2nd
  • [5] Ten Steps in Scale Development and Reporting: A Guide for Researchers
    Carpenter, Serena
    [J]. COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES, 2018, 12 (01) : 25 - 44
  • [6] DeVellis R.F., 2017, Scale development: theory and applications, DOI DOI 10.1037/0022-006X.56.5.754
  • [7] A Process of Becoming: The Stages of New Nursing Graduate Professional Role Transition
    Duchscher, Judy Boychuk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2008, 39 (10) : 441 - 450
  • [8] Field A., 2017, Discovering Statistics Using R
  • [9] Hair J., 2009, Multivariate Data Analysis
  • [10] Effects of pre-graduation characteristics and working environments on transition shock of newly graduated nurses: A longitudinal study
    Kim, Eun-Young
    Yeo, Jung Hee
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2019, 78 : 32 - 36