Comparative Analysis of Several Near-Field Probes for Magnetic Field Measurements

被引:1
作者
Li, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Shao, Weiheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tian, Xinxin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Duo-Long [1 ,4 ]
Ruan, Litao [1 ,4 ]
Xue, Shan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Phys & Optoelect Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] China Elect Prod Reliabil & Environm Testing Res I, Guangzhou 511370, Peoples R China
[3] South China Univ Technol SCUT, Sch Microelect, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Electromech Engn, State Key Lab Precis Elect Mfg Technol & Equipment, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Electric field suppression; magnetic field measurement; magnetic field probe; near-field measurement; HIGH-SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1109/JSEN.2023.3325924
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The near-field magnetic probe ( H -probe) is an essential diagnostic tool for analyzing electromagnetic interference in electronic products. Many types of H -probes have been designed and manufactured in recent years. Nevertheless, the performance of these probes in practical magnetic field ( H -field) measurement is not clear. In this article, six typical H -probes with the same loop area, labeled as UHP11, SHP11, UHP12, SHP12, UHP22, and SHP22, are designed and fabricated. The key parameters that can evaluate the performance of H -probes include frequency response (FR), intrusion of the probe to the device under test (DUT), spatial resolution (SR), common-mode electric field ( E -field) suppression, and differential E -field suppression. To analyze the key parameters of these probes, full-wave models of these H -probes are simulated and compared with measurements. Meanwhile, the equivalent circuit models of these H -probes are established to analyze E -field suppression in H -field measurement. The measurement results indicate that the shielded one-loop H -probe with differential output ports (SHP12) achieves the best differential E -field suppression, which is 26 dB at 5 GHz. In addition to the outstanding suppression performance on differential E -field, its common-mode E -field suppression is also the best and greater than 30 dB within 14.3 GHz. The SR of six H -probes is basically consistent in the measurement. Except for the higher sensitivity of the two-loop H -probes (UHP22 and SHP22), SHP12 shows the best comprehensive H -field measurement performance.
引用
收藏
页码:28723 / 28732
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 619673 IEC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, document 61967-6
[3]   Magnetic Near-Field Probes With High-Pass and Notch Filters for Electric Field Suppression [J].
Chou, Yien-Tien ;
Lu, Hsin-Chia .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, 2013, 61 (06) :2460-2470
[4]  
Chou YT, 2011, IEEE INT SYMP ELEC, P6, DOI 10.1109/ISEMC.2011.6038275
[5]   Noncontact RF Voltage Sensing of a Printed Trace via a Capacitive-Coupled Probe [J].
Fang, Wenxiao ;
Qiu, Haimi ;
Luo, Chengyang ;
Wang, Lei ;
Shao, Weiheng ;
Shao, E. ;
Li, Shajin ;
En, Yunfei .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (21) :8873-8882
[6]   A new miniature magnetic field probe for measuring three-dimensional fields in planar high-frequency circuits [J].
Gao, YJ ;
Wolff, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, 1996, 44 (06) :911-918
[7]   NEAR-FIELD PROBE USED AS A DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL TO LOCATE DEFECTIVE ELEMENTS IN AN ARRAY ANTENNA [J].
LEE, JJ ;
FERREN, EM ;
WOOLLEN, DP ;
LEE, KM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1988, 36 (06) :884-889
[8]   Ultrawideband Differential Magnetic Near Field Probe With High Electric Field Suppression [J].
Li, Guangwei ;
Shao, Weiheng ;
Chen, Rongquan ;
Tian, Xinxin ;
Huang, Quan ;
Zhang, Xiu Yin ;
Fang, Wenxiao ;
Chen, Yiqiang .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (14) :7669-7676
[9]   Symmetrical double-loop H-field probe with floating shield for improving sensitivity and electric field suppression [J].
Liu, Jiesheng ;
Xiao, Meizhen ;
He, Xiao ;
Fang, Wenxiao ;
Shao, Weiheng ;
Huang, Quan ;
Lu, Guoguang ;
Wang, Lei ;
Huang, Yun ;
En, Yunfei ;
Yao, Ruohe .
IET MICROWAVES ANTENNAS & PROPAGATION, 2021, 15 (05) :464-473
[10]   Emission Source Microscopy Technique for EMI Source Localization [J].
Maheshwari, Pratik ;
Kajbaf, Hamed ;
Khilkevich, Victor V. ;
Pommerenke, David .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2016, 58 (03) :729-737