A Review of Energy Modalities Used for Focal Therapy of Prostate Cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Tayebi, Shima [1 ]
Debnath, Neha [2 ]
Sidana, Abhinav [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai Morningside West, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Chicago Med & Biol Sci, Dept Surg, Sect Urol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Focal therapy; Ablation; Recurrence; INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; PARTIAL GLAND ABLATION; INTERSTITIAL TUMOR ABLATION; LASER-ABLATION; IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION; PHOTOTHERMAL ABLATION; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; THERMAL THERAPY; CRYOTHERAPY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s40137-023-00380-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of ReviewProstate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent cancer among men that needs effective treatment approaches. Traditionally, PCa was managed through whole-gland radical therapy or Active Surveillance. However, the field has witnessed a notable shift towards less invasive treatment options. Focal prostate ablation has emerged as a promising method for PCa treatment, using a range of energy modalities, each with its unique mechanism and proven efficacy in different settings. This review aims to discuss the different energy modalities used for focal therapy of prostate cancer, their mechanism of action, and clinical outcomes.Recent FindingsFocal therapy is a developing treatment option that involves focal treatment of PCa. Recent findings suggest Focal therapy for PCa shows well-tolerated and great oncological outcomes in localized prostate cancer while minimizing the side effects and damage to non-cancerous tissue. Currently, there are various modalities used for prostate cancer treatment, and new modalities are continually being introduced. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages, and the selection of the appropriate method becomes important for improved treatment and cancer management. Familiarizing ourselves with these modalities, understanding their mechanisms, and recognizing their limitations can assist us in making more informed decisions regarding treatment methods for patients and achieving better outcomes.SummaryProstate focal therapy employs a variety of energy modalities, each with its own set of benefits and drawbacks, making certain modalities more suitable for specific groups of patients. Having a comprehensive understanding of these modalities, including their mechanisms, drawbacks, and limitations, is crucial and beneficial. Additionally, identifying the ideal candidates for each modality can significantly enhance treatment approaches and ultimately lead to improved outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 346
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health technology assessment in evolution - focal therapy in localised prostate cancer
    Valerio, Massimo
    Emberton, Mark
    Barret, Eric
    Eberli, Daniel
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Jichlinski, Patrice
    Ward, John F.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2014, 14 (11) : 1359 - 1367
  • [32] Current state of image-guided focal therapy for prostate cancer
    Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael R.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    Nahar, Bruno
    Shin, Toshitaka
    Guven, Selcuk
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (03) : 701 - 717
  • [33] Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: is there a "middle ground" between active surveillance and definitive treatment
    Demirel, Cihan H.
    Altok, Muammer
    Davis, John W.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2019, 21 (01): : 37 - 44
  • [34] Evolution from active surveillance to focal therapy in the management of prostate cancer
    Lindner, Uri
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Trachtenberg, John
    Lindner, Arie
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2011, 7 (06) : 775 - 787
  • [35] German S3 Evidence-Based Guidelines on Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: The First Evidence-Based Guidelines on Focal Therapy
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Blana, Andreas
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Cash, Hannes
    Ehrmann, Udo
    Franiel, Tobias
    Henkel, Thomas-Oliver
    Hoecht, Stefan
    Kristiansen, Glen
    Machtens, Stefan
    Niehoff, Peter
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Pinkawa, Michael
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Roth, Wilfried
    Witzsch, Ullrich
    Ganzer, Roman
    Schlemmer, Heinz Peter
    Grimm, Marc-Oliver
    Hakenberg, Oliver W.
    Schostak, Martin
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2022, : 431 - 439
  • [36] Focal therapy for prostate cancer. Alternative treatment
    Gomez-Veiga, F.
    Martinez-Breijo, S.
    Solsona-Narbon, E.
    Hernandez, C.
    Ciudin, A.
    Ribal, M. J.
    Dickinson, L.
    Moore, C.
    Ahmed, H.
    Rodriguez Antolin, A.
    Breda, A.
    Gaya, J.
    Portela-Pereira, P.
    Emberton, M.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2014, 38 (07): : 465 - 475
  • [37] New technologies and techniques for prostate cancer focal therapy
    Linares-Espinos, Estefania
    Carneiro, Arie
    Martinez-Salamanca, Juan I.
    Bianco, Fernando
    Castro-Alfaro, Adalberto
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Valerio, Massimo
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2018, 70 (03) : 252 - 263
  • [38] Surveillance after prostate focal therapy
    Kae Jack Tay
    Mahul B. Amin
    Sangeet Ghai
    Rafael E. Jimenez
    James G. Kench
    Laurence Klotz
    Rodolfo Montironi
    Satoru Muto
    Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
    Baris Turkbey
    Arnauld Villers
    Thomas J. Polascik
    World Journal of Urology, 2019, 37 : 397 - 407
  • [39] Surveillance after prostate focal therapy
    Tay, Kae Jack
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Ghai, Sangeet
    Jimenez, Rafael E.
    Kench, James G.
    Klotz, Laurence
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Muto, Satoru
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Villers, Arnauld
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (03) : 397 - 407
  • [40] Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Rationale and Treatment Opportunities
    Kasivisvanathan, V.
    Emberton, M.
    Ahmed, H. U.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 25 (08) : 461 - 473